%% You should probably cite draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-11 instead of this revision.
@techreport{takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-06,
    number =    {draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps/06/},
    author =    {Attila Takacs and Benoit Tremblay},
    title =     {{GMPLS RSVP-TE Recovery Extension for data plane initiated reversion and protection timer signalling}},
    pagetotal = 12,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {GMPLS RSVP-TE recovery extensions are specified in {[}RFC4872{]} and {[}RFC4873{]}. Currently recovery signalling does not support the request for revertive protection, neither the configuration of recovery timers. This document extends the PROTECTION Object format allowing sub-TLVs, and defines two sub-TLVs to carry wait-to-restore and hold-off intervals.Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in},
}