YANG Data Node Self Explanation Tags
draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-00
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ran Tao , Qin Wu | ||
| Last updated | 2019-11-03 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-00
NETMOD Working Group R. Tao
Internet-Draft Q. Wu
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei
Expires: May 5, 2020 November 2, 2019
YANG Data Node Self Explanation Tags
draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-00
Abstract
This document defines a method to tag data node associated with
telemetry data in YANG Modules. This YANG data node tagging method
can be used to filter queries of operational state on a server during
a "pub/sub" service for YANG datastore updates when the state of all
subscriptions of a particular Subscriber to be fetched is huge, so
that the amount of data to be streamed out to the destination can be
greatly reduced.
An extension statement to be used to indicate YANG data node tags
that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically(i.e.,
outside of configuration).
A YANG module [RFC7950] is defined, which augment Module tag model
and provides a list of data node entries to allow for adding or
removing of data node tags as well as viewing the set of tags
associated with a YANG module.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 5, 2020.
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Use cases for Data Node tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Data Node Tag Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. IETF Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Vendor Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. User Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4. Reserved Tags Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Data Node Tag Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Module Design Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Implementation Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. User Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Tags Module Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Tags Module Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Guidelines to Model Writers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.1. Define Standard Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.1. YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes Registry . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.2. IETF YANG Data Node Tags Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry . . . . . . . . 11
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
1. Introduction
As described [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags], the use of tags for
classification and organization is fairly ubiquitous not only within
IETF protocols, but in the internet itself(e.g., "#hashtags"). A
module tag defined in [I.D-ietf-netmod-module-tags] is a string
associated only with a module name at module level.
This document define data node tag and associate them with data node
within YANG modules. The data node tags can be learnt dynamically by
the client from the live server and used to filter queries of
configuration or operational state on a server based on these data
node tags,.e.g.,return specific object type operational state related
to system-management. NETCONF clients can discover data models with
data nod tags supported by a NETCONF server via <get-schema>
operation. The data node tag capability can also be advertised via
Capability Notification Model [I-D.netconf-notification-capabilities]
by the NETCONF server or some place where offline document are kept.
These tags may be registered as well as assigned during the module
definition; assigned by implementations; or dynamically defined and
set by users.
This document defines a YANG module [RFC7950] which augments Module
tag model and provides a list of data node entries to allow for
adding or removing of tags as well as viewing the set of tags
associated with a data node within YANG modules.
This document defines an extension statement to be used to indicate
tags that SHOULD be added by the module implementation automatically
(i.e., outside of configuration).
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture defined in [RFC8342].
1.1. Use cases for Data Node tags
The following is a list of already implemented and potential use
cases.
One example use of data node tags would be to help filter different
discrete categories of YANG data node within YANG modules supported
by a device. For example, if data nodes within YANG modules are
suitably tagged and learnt by the client from a live server, then an
XPath query can be used by the client to list all of the performance
related data nodes supported by a device.
Data node tags can also be used to help coordination when clients are
interacting with large amount of devices with the same categories of
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
YANG data node across different YANG modules. For example, one
management client could mark some specific data node across modules
implemented in various different devices with the same performance-
metric tag, so all the devices can provide consistent representation
and reporting for the same category of YANG data nodes.
Future management protocol extensions could allow for filtering
queries of configuration or operational state on a server based on
tags. For example, return all operational state related to system-
management.
1.2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Data Node Tag Values
All data node tags SHOULD begin with a prefix indicating who owns
their definition. An IANA registry (Section 7.1) is used to support
registering data node tag prefixes. Currently 3 prefixes are
defined.
No further structure is imposed by this document on the value
following the registered prefix, and the value can contain any YANG
type 'string' characters except carriage-returns, newlines and tabs.
Therefore, designers, implementers, and users are free to add or not
add any structure they may require to their own tag values.
2.1. IETF Tags Prefix
An IETF tag is a data node tag that has the prefix "ietf:dn:". All
IETF data node tags are registered with IANA in a registry defined
later in this document (Section 7.2).
2.2. Vendor Tags Prefix
A vendor tag is a tag that has the prefix "vendor:dn:". These tags
are defined by the vendor that implements the module, and are not
registered; however, it is RECOMMENDED that the vendor include extra
identification in the tag to avoid collisions such as using the
enterpise or organization name following the "vendor:dn:" prefix
(e.g., vendor:dn:vendor-defined-classifier).
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
2.3. User Tags Prefix
A user tag is any tag that has the prefix "user:dn:". These tags are
defined by the user/administrator and are not meant to be registered.
Users are not required to use the "user:dn:" prefix; however, doing
so is RECOMMENDED as it helps avoid prefix collisions.
2.4. Reserved Tags Prefix
Any tag not starting with the prefix "ietf:dn:", "vendor:dn:" or
"user:dn:" is reserved for future use. These tag values are not
invalid, but simply reserved in the context of specifications (e.g.,
RFCs).
3. Data Node Tag Management
Tags can become associated with a data node within YANG module in a
number of ways. Tags may be defined and associated at module design
time, at implementation time without the need of live server, or via
user administrative control . As the main consumer of data node tags
are users, users may also remove any tag from a live server, no
matter how the tag became associated with a data node within a YANG
module.
3.1. Module Design Tagging
A data node definition MAY indicate a set of data node tags to be
added by the module implementer. These design time tags are
indicated using the node-tag extension statement.
If the data node is defined in an IETF standards track document, the
data node tags MUST be IETF Tags (2.1). Thus, new data node can
drive the addition of new IETF tags to the IANA registry defined in
Section 7.2, and the IANA registry can serve as a check against
duplication.
3.2. Implementation Tagging
An implementation MAY include additional tags associated with data
node within a YANG module. These tags SHOULD be IETF Tags (i.e.,
registered) or vendor specific tags.
3.3. User Tagging
Data node tags of any kind, with or without a prefix, can be assigned
and removed by the user from a live server using normal configuration
mechanisms. In order to remove a data node tag from the operational
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
datastore the user adds a matching "masked-tag" entry for a given
data node within the ietf-data-node-tags Module.
4. Tags Module Structure
4.1. Tags Module Tree
The tree associated with the "ietf-data-node-tags" module follows.
The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340].
module: ietf-data-node-tags
augment /tags:module-tags/tags:module:
+--rw data-node-tags
+--rw data-node* [node-name]
+--rw node-name nacm:node-instance-identifier
+--rw tag* tags:tag
+--rw masked-tag* tags:tag
+--rw group-id string
5. YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-data-node-tags@2019-05-03.yang"
module ietf-data-node-tags {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-node-tags";
prefix ntags;
import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; }
import ietf-netconf-acm { prefix nacm; }
import ietf-module-tags { prefix tags; }
organization
"IETF NetMod Working Group (NetMod)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
Author: Ran Tao
<mailto:taoran20@huawei.com>
Author: Qin Wu
<mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>";
// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and
// remove this note.
description
"This module describes a mechanism associating tags with YANG data
node within YANG modules. Tags may be IANA assigned or privately defined.
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when,
they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC publication
// and RFC number and remove this note.
revision 2019-05-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference "RFC XXXX: YANG Data Node Tags";
}
typedef node-tag {
type string {
length "1..max";
pattern '[\S ]+';
}
description
"A tag is a type 'string' value that does not include carriage
return, newline or tab characters. It SHOULD begin with a
registered prefix; however, tags without a registered prefix
SHOULD NOT be treated as invalid.";
}
extension node-tag {
argument node-tag;
description
"The argument 'tag' is of type 'tag'. This extension statement
is used by module authors to indicate the data node tags that SHOULD be
added automatically by the system. As such the origin of the
value for the pre-defined tags should be set to 'system'
[RFC8342].";
}
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
augment "/tags:module-tags/tags:module" {
description
"Augment the Tags module with data node tag attributes";
container data-node-tags {
description
"Contains the list of data nodes and their associated tags";
list data-node {
key "node-name";
description
"A list of modules and their associated tags";
leaf node-name {
type nacm:node-instance-identifier;
mandatory true;
description
"The YANG module name.";
}
leaf-list node-tag {
type node-tag;
description
"Tags associated with the data node within YANG module. See
the IANA 'YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes' registry for reserved
prefixes and the IANA'IETF YANG Data Node Tags' registry for
IETF tags.
The 'operational' state [RFC8342] view of this list is
constructed using the following steps:
1) System tags (i.e., tags of 'system' origin) are added.
2) User configured tags (i.e., tags of 'intended' origin)
are added.
3) Any tag that is equal to a masked-tag is removed.";
}
leaf-list node-masked-tag {
type node-tag;
description
"The list of tags that should not be associated with this
data node. The user can remove (mask) tags from the
operational state datastore [RFC8342] by adding them to
this list. It is not an error to add tags to this list
that are not associated with the data node within the module,
but they have no operational effect.";
}
leaf group-id {
type string;
description
"This group ID is used to identify a set of data nodes
of the same group which have a common characteristic.";
}
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Guidelines to Model Writers
This section updates [RFC8407].
6.1. Define Standard Tags
A module MAY indicate, using node-tag extension statements, a set of
tags that are to be automatically associated with it (i.e., not added
through configuration).
module example-module {
//...
import module-tags { prefix tags; }
container top {
ntags:node-tag "ietf:dn:object-type";
list X {
ntags:node-tag "ietf:dn:property";
}
container Y {
ntags:node-tag "ietf:dn:performance-metric";
}
}
// ...
}
The module writer can use existing standard tags, or use new tags
defined in the model definition, as appropriate. For IETF
standardized modules new data node tags MUST be assigned in the IANA
registry defined below, see Section 7.2.
7. IANA Considerations
7.1. YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes Registry
IANA is asked to create a new registry "YANG Data Node Tag Prefixes"
grouped under a new "Protocol" category named "YANG Data Node Tag
Prefixes".
This registry allocates tag prefixes. All YANG data node tags SHOULD
begin with one of the prefixes in this registry.
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
Prefix entries in this registry should be short strings consisting of
lowercase ASCII alpha-numeric characters and a final ":" character.
The allocation policy for this registry is Specification Required
[RFC8126]. The Reference and Assignee values should be sufficient to
identify and contact the organization that has been allocated the
prefix.
The initial values for this registry are as follows.
+----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+
| Prefix | Description | Reference | Assignee |
+----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+
| ietf:dn: | IETF Tags allocated in the IANA | [This | IETF |
| | IETF YANG Data Node Tags registry| document] | |
| | | | |
|vendor:dn:| Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF |
| | the module implementer. | document] | |
| | | | |
| user:dn: | Non-registered tags allocated by | [This | IETF |
| | and for the user. | document] | |
+----------+----------------------------------+-----------+----------+
Other standards organizations (SDOs) wishing to allocate their own
set of tags should allocate a prefix from this registry.
7.2. IETF YANG Data Node Tags Registry
IANA is asked to create a new registry "IETF YANG Module Tags"
grouped under a new "Protocol" category "IETF YANG Module Tags".
This registry should be included below "YANG Module Tag Prefixes"
when listed on the same page.
This registry allocates tags that have the registered prefix "ietf:".
New values should be well considered and not achievable through a
combination of already existing IETF tags.
The allocation policy for this registry is IETF Review [RFC8126].
The initial values for this registry are as follows.
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
+----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+
| Tag | Description | Reference |
+----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+
| | | |
| ietf:dn:object-type | Relates to object type | [This |
| | (e.g., interfaces). | document] |
| | | |
| ietf:dn:performance-metric | Relates to performance | [This |
| | metric | document] |
| | (e.g., ifstatistics). | |
| | | |
| ietf:dn:property | Represents a object | [This |
| | property | document] |
| | (e.g.,ifindex). | |
| | | |
|ietf:dn:statistics-operation| Relates to statistics | [This |
| | operation(e.g.,average, | document] |
| | min, max, sum,etc) | |
+----------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+
7.3. Updates to the IETF XML Registry
This document registers a URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688].
Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration has
been made:
URI:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-node-tags
Registrant Contact:
The IESG.
XML:
N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
7.4. Updates to the YANG Module Names Registry
This document registers one YANG module in the "YANG Module Names"
registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the following
registration has been made:
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
name:
ietf-data-node-tags
namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-data-node-tags
prefix:
tags
reference:
RFC XXXX (RFC Ed.: replace XXX with actual RFC number and remove
this note.)
8. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via
the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the
secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is SSH [RFC6242].
This document adds the ability to associate data node tag meta-data
with YANG modules. This document does not define any actions based
on these associations, and none are yet defined, and therefore it
does not by itself introduce any new security considerations.
Users of the data node tag-meta data may define various actions to be
taken based on the data node tag meta-data. These actions and their
definitions are outside the scope of this document. Users will need
to consider the security implications of any actions they choose to
define.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of
Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8407>.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
Authors' Addresses
Ran Tao
Huawei
Email: taoran20@huawei.com
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Self Explanation Tags November 2019
Qin Wu
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
China
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Tao & Wu Expires May 5, 2020 [Page 14]