Evaluation Of DIAMETER Against MIDCOM Requirements
draft-taylor-midcom-diameter-eval-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Tom Taylor 
Last updated 2002-04-30
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-taylor-midcom-diameter-eval-01.txt

Abstract

This document is submitted as part of the Midcom protocol selection process. It evaluates the suitability of the Diameter protocol as a transport for Midcom. The general conclusions are: . the Diameter architecture may be too heavy for the Midcom application, although this is a matter for discussion. It is clear in any event that much of the Diameter base is not needed; . a new application extension to Diameter would have to be defined to meet Midcom's requirements; . with these reservations, the protocol is a good fit to Midcom requirements. This version contains added details describing how to use Diameter to meet the requirements.

Authors

Tom Taylor (tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)