Skip to main content

Example Media Types for Use in Documentation
draft-taylor-types-example-05

Yes

(Cullen Jennings)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Sam Hartman)

No Objection

(Bill Fenner)
(Brian Carpenter)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-05-10) Unknown
It is not clear to me why this document is on track for Proposed Standard. I can hardly see how it can be checked vs. criteria of progressing on standards track. Section 5 says 'The 'example' media type and subtypes are defined for use in documentation only.'. RFC4288 - a BCP itself - says in Section 3.1 'In the case of registration for the IETF itself, the registration proposal MUST be published as an RFC' without making a statement about the need for a standards track RFC. Maybe there are some other considerations of consistency, or some precedents that escape me.
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2006-05-10) Unknown
I understand that there has been a bunch of discussion in a couple WGs about whether it's OK for documents to use unregistered example MIME types, and that has prompted this proposal.  While I think that the original document critique is a stupid concern and over-literalist, I'm OK with the example types being registered if it stops the time-wasting discussions.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown