LTP Fragmentation
draft-templin-dtn-ltpfrag-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Fred Templin | ||
| Last updated | 2020-10-12 (latest revision 2020-04-10) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-templin-dtn-ltpfrag-00.txt
Abstract
The Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP) provides a reliable datagram "covergence layer" for the Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) Bundle Protocol. In common practice, LTP is often configured over UDP/IP sockets and inherits its maximum segment size from the maximum-sized UDP datagram. This document discussses LTP interactions with IP fragmentation and mitigations for managing the amount of IP fragmentation employed.
Authors
Fred Templin (fltemplin@acm.org)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)