On the Politics of Standards
draft-tenoever-hrpc-political-05
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(hrpc RG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Niels ten Oever , Amelia Andersdotter | ||
| Last updated | 2018-08-20 (Latest revision 2018-06-18) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-irtf-hrpc-political | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | IRTF state | Replaced | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-irtf-hrpc-political | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IETF cannot ordain which standards or protocols are to be used on network, but the standards developing process in the IETF has a normative effect. Among other things the standardisation work at the IETF has implications on what is perceived as technologically possible and useful where networking technologies are being deployed, and its standards output reflect was is considered by the technical community as feasible and good practice. Because mediates many aspects of modern life, and therefore contributes to the ordering of societies and communities, the consideration of the politics and (potential) impact of protocols should be part of the standardization and development process.
Authors
Niels ten Oever
Amelia Andersdotter
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)