A Proposed Model for RFC Editing and Publication
draft-thomson-rfced-model-01
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Martin Thomson | ||
| Last updated | 2021-02-10 (latest revision 2020-08-09) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-rfced-model-01.txt
Abstract
The finishing process for a document that is approved for publication as an RFC currently involves a somewhat detailed and lengthy process. The system that executes that process involves a number of different actors, each bringing competency with different aspects of the overall process. Ensuring that this process functions smoothly is critical to the mission of the organizations that publish documents in the RFC series. This document proposes a framework for that system that aims to provide clear delineations of accountability and responsibility for each of the actors in this system.
Authors
Martin Thomson (mt@lowentropy.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)