Making RFC and Internet-Draft Boilerplate Less Conspicuous
draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Thomson , David Schinazi | ||
| Last updated | 2025-07-23 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00
RFC Series Working Group M. Thomson
Internet-Draft Mozilla
Intended status: Informational D. Schinazi
Expires: 24 January 2026 Google
23 July 2025
Making RFC and Internet-Draft Boilerplate Less Conspicuous
draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff-00
Abstract
This document establishes a new policy for RFCs and Internet-Drafts
that moves all the fluff (copyright notices and that sort of thing)
to the bottom of documents.
1. New Policy
No one reads the legal shrink wrap. All we do by forcing it under
their noses is annoy them and waste their time.
The IETF can better serve its audience by moving boilerplate in RFCs
and Internet-Drafts to the bottom of documents. This ensures that
notices exist, but are minimally annoying.
2. Security Considerations
The obvious argument is that placement of notices is a security
feature. However, given the wide acceptance of the fact that
security by obscurity is not an adequate defense, the use of
obscurity to improve usability equally cannot be expected to degrade
security.
3. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
The latest revision of this draft can be found at
https://martinthomson.github.io/bottom-fluff/draft-thomson-rswg-
bottom-fluff.html. Status information for this document may be found
at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-rswg-bottom-fluff/.
Discussion of this document takes place on the RFC Series Working
Group Editorial Stream Working Group mailing list (mailto:rswg@rfc-
editor.org), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/martinthomson/bottom-fluff.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 January 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Acknowledgments
The Internet Protocol Mercenary Company (IPMC) are acknowledged for
continuing their ongoing defense of the intellectual property in
RFCs.
Authors' Addresses
Martin Thomson
Mozilla
Email: mt@lowentropy.net
David Schinazi
Google
Email: dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com