Available Routing Constructs
draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Pascal Thubert , Gabor Sandor Enyedi, Srinivasan Ramasubramanian | ||
| Last updated | 2013-07-29 (Latest revision 2013-01-21) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in order to support applicability statements.
Authors
Pascal Thubert
Gabor Sandor Enyedi
Srinivasan Ramasubramanian
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)