Available Routing Constructs
draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Pascal Thubert , Gabor Sandor Enyedi , Srinivasan Ramasubramanian | ||
| Last updated | 2013-07-29 (Latest revision 2013-01-21) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
Abstract
This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in order to support applicability statements.
Authors
Pascal Thubert
Gabor Sandor Enyedi
Srinivasan Ramasubramanian
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)