SRv6 Deployment Consideration
draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-07
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Hui Tian , Feng Zhao , Chongfeng Xie , Tong Li , Jichun Ma , Robbins Mwehair , Edmore Chingwena , Qingbang Xu , Primadi Hendra Kusuma , Shuping Peng , Tianran Zhou , Qiangzhou Gao , Zhu Keyi | ||
| Last updated | 2023-09-14 (Latest revision 2023-03-13) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
SRv6 has significant advantages over SR-MPLS and has attracted more and more attention and interest from network operators and verticals. Smooth network migration towards SRv6 is a key focal point and this document provides network design and migration guidance and recommendations on solutions in various scenarios. Deployment cases with SRv6 are also introduced.
Authors
Hui Tian
Feng Zhao
Chongfeng Xie
Tong Li
Jichun Ma
Robbins Mwehair
Edmore Chingwena
Qingbang Xu
Primadi Hendra Kusuma
Shuping Peng
Tianran Zhou
Qiangzhou Gao
Zhu Keyi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)