Transport Northbound Interface Use Cases
draft-tnbidt-ccamp-transport-nbi-use-cases-02

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-07-03
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
CCAMP Working Group                                      I. Busi (Ed.)
Internet Draft                                                 Huawei
Intended status: Informational                                D. King
                                                  Lancaster University

Expires: December 2017                                   July 03, 2017

                 Transport Northbound Interface Use Cases
               draft-tnbidt-ccamp-transport-nbi-use-cases-02

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
   reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 28, 2017.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
   respect to this document.

Busi & King, et al.   Expires December 28, 2017               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft         Transport NBI Use Cases               June 2017

Abstract

   Transport network domains, including Optical Transport Network (OTN)
   and Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) networks, are typically
   deployed based on a single vendor or technology platforms. They are
   often managed using proprietary interfaces to dedicated Element
   Management Systems (EMS), Network Management Systems (NMS) and
   increasingly Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers.

   A well-defined open interface to each domain management system or
   controller is required for network operators to facilitate control
   automation and orchestrate end-to-end services across multi-domain
   networks. These functions may be enabled using standardized data
   models (e.g. YANG), and appropriate protocol (e.g., RESTCONF).

   This document describes the key use cases and requirements for
   transport network control and management. It reviews proposed and
   existing IETF transport network data models, their applicability,
   and highlights gaps and requirements.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction..................................................3
   2. Conventions used in this document.............................3
   3. Use Case 1: Single-domain with single-layer...................3
      3.1. Reference Network........................................3
         3.1.1. Single Transport Domain - OTN Network...............4
      3.2. Topology Abstractions....................................6
      3.3. Service Configuration....................................7
         3.3.1. ODU Transit.........................................7
         3.3.2. EPL over ODU........................................8
         3.3.3. Other OTN Client Services...........................8
         3.3.4. EVPL over ODU.......................................9
         3.3.5. EVPLAN and EVPTree Services.........................9
         3.3.6. Virtual Network Services............................9
      3.4. Multi-functional Access Links............................9
      3.5. Protection Scenarios.....................................9
         3.5.1. Linear Protection...................................10
   4. Use Case 2: Single-domain with multi-layer....................11
   5. Use Case 3: Multi-domain with single-layer....................11
   6. Use Case 4: Multi-domain and multi-layer......................11
   7. Security Considerations.......................................11
   8. IANA Considerations...........................................11
   9. References....................................................11
      9.1. Normative References.....................................11
      9.2. Informative References...................................11
   10. Acknowledgments..............................................12

Busi & King, et al.   Expires December 28, 2017               [Page 2]
Show full document text