Carrying SID Algorithm information in PCE-based Networks.
draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Zoey Rose , Siva Sivabalan , Mahendra Singh Negi | ||
Last updated | 2019-07-03 | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo, draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo, draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo, draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-00
PCE Working Group A. Tokar Internet-Draft S. Sivabalan Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. Expires: January 1, 2020 M. Negi Huawei Technologies June 30, 2019 Carrying SID Algorithm information in PCE-based Networks. draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-00 Abstract The Algorithm associated with a prefix Segment-ID (SID) defines the path computation Algorithm used by Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). This information is available to controllers such as the Path Computation Element (PCE) via topology learning. This document proposes an approach for informing headend routers regarding the Algorithm associated with each prefix SID used in PCE-computed paths. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 1, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Tokar, et al. Expires January 1, 2020 [Page 1] Internet-Draft SID Algorithm in PCEP June 2019 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. SR ERO NAI Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6.1. PCEP SR-ERO NAI Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction A PCE can compute SR-TE paths using prefix SIDs with different Algorithms depending on the use-case, constraints, etc. While this information is available on the PCE, there is no method of conveying this information to the headend router. Similarly, the headend can also compute SR-TE paths using different Algorithms, and this information also needs to be conveyed to the PCE for collection or troubleshooting purposes. In addition, in the case of multiple (redundant) PCEs, when the headend receives a path from the primary PCE, it needs to be able to report the complete path information - including the Algorithm - to the backup PCE so that in HA scenarios, the backup PCE can verify the prefix SIDs appropriately. Refer to [I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] and [I-D.ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] for details about the prefix SID Algorithm. This document introduces two new NAI types for the SR-ERO subobject, which is defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing]. Tokar, et al. Expires January 1, 2020 [Page 2] Internet-Draft SID Algorithm in PCEP June 2019 2. Terminology The following terminologies are used in this document: ERO: Explicit Route Object IGP: Interior Gateway Protocol NAI: Node or Adjacency Identifier. PCE: Path Computation Element PCEP: Path Computation Element Protocol. SID: Segment Identifier. SR: Segment Routing. SR-TE: Segment Routing Traffic Engineering. 3. SR ERO NAI Extensions The SR-ERO subobject encoding is extended with additional NAI types. The following new NAI types (NT) are defined: o NT=TBD1: The NAI is an IPv4 node ID with Algorithm. o NT=TBD1: The NAI is an IPv6 node ID with Algorithm. This document defines the following NAIs: 'IPv4 Node ID with Algorithm' is specified as an IPv4 address and Algorithm identifier. In this case, the NT value is TBD1 and the NAI field length is 8 octets. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Node IPv4 address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved | Algorithm | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: NAI for IPv4 Node SID with Algorithm Tokar, et al. Expires January 1, 2020 [Page 3] Internet-Draft SID Algorithm in PCEP June 2019 'IPv6 Node ID with Algorithm' is specified as an IPv6 address and Algorithm identifier. In this case, the NT value is TBD2 and the NAI field length is 20 octets. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ // Node IPv6 address (16 octets) // +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved | Algorithm | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: NAI for IPv6 Node SID with Algorithm 4. Operation IPv4 prefix SIDs used by SR-TE paths with an associated Algorithm SHOULD be encoded with 'IPv4 Node ID with Algorithm' NAI. IPv6 prefix SIDs used by SR-TE paths with an associated Algorithm SHOULD be encoded with 'IPv6 Node ID with Algorithm' NAI. 5. Security Considerations No additional security measure is required. 6. IANA Considerations 6.1. PCEP SR-ERO NAI Types IANA is requested to allocate new SR-ERO NAI types for the new NAI types specified in this document. Value Description Reference TBD1 IPv4 Node ID with This document Algorithm TBD2 IPv6 Node ID with This document Algorithm 7. Normative References [I-D.ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] Previdi, S., Ginsberg, L., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Gredler, H., and B. Decraene, "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing- extensions-25 (work in progress), May 2019. Tokar, et al. Expires January 1, 2020 [Page 4] Internet-Draft SID Algorithm in PCEP June 2019 [I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-segment- routing-extensions-27 (work in progress), December 2018. [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16 (work in progress), March 2019. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. Authors' Addresses Alex Tokar Cisco Systems, Inc. Eurovea Central 3. Pribinova 10 Bratislava 811 09 Slovakia Email: atokar@cisco.com Siva Sivabalan Cisco Systems, Inc. 2000 Innovation Drive Kanata, Ontario K2K 3E8 Canada Email: msiva@cisco.com Mahendra Singh Negi Huawei Technologies Divyashree Techno Park, Whitefield Bangalore, Karnataka 560066 India Email: mahendrasingh@huawei.com Tokar, et al. Expires January 1, 2020 [Page 5]