Comparison of 6lo and SCHC
draft-toutain-6lo-6lo-and-schc-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ana Minaburo , Laurent Toutain | ||
| Last updated | 2020-05-07 (Latest revision 2019-11-04) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
6lo and 6lowpan have standardized a stateless IPv6 and UDP compression method for mesh networks. SCHC proposes a generic compression mechanism that can be applied to any protocol stack. The lpwan working group is focusing on star topologies for IPv6, UDP and CoAP header compression and fragmentation. This document summarizes the differences between 6lo and SCHC and possible combination of SCHC and 6lo.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)