%% You should probably cite rfc5940 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{turner-additional-cms-ri-choices-06,
    number =    {draft-turner-additional-cms-ri-choices-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-turner-additional-cms-ri-choices/06/},
    author =    {Russ Housley and Sean Turner},
    title =     {{Additional Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Revocation Information Choices}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2010,
    month =     jun,
    day =       3,
    abstract =  {The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) allows revocation information to be conveyed as part of the SignedData, EnvelopedData, AuthenticatedData, and AuthEnvelopedData content types. The preferred format for revocation information is the Certificate Revocation List (CRL), but an extension mechanism supports other revocation information formats. This document defines two additional revocation information formats for Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses and Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP) requests and responses. {[}STANDARDS-TRACK{]}},
}