Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)
draft-turner-additional-new-asn-08
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
IMO, this should be PS *and* formally "Update" these other RFCs. See Stuart's discuss. Section 6., paragraph 13: > -- Define each of the MAC-ALGOIRTHM objects to describe the Nit: s/MAC-ALGOIRTHM/MAC-ALGORITHM/ Section 2., paragraph 1: > Protocol designers can make use of the '08 ASN.1 contraints to define Nit: s/contraints/constraints/
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
I support Stewart's Discuss. Although the resultant long list of "updates" may be a nuisance to some, it is important for the person who plans to update one of the other RFCs to know that this update exists. --- I am a bit confused why the document talks about RFCs using the old (1988) syntax, but only describes the updates from 2002 to 2008.
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
I support Stewart's DISCUSS in regards to updating other RFCs, in particular RFC 5911, which defined earlier versions of new style ASN.1 modules. I don't have much opinion regarding Informational versa PS, but I think PS would have been just fine. Which tool was used to verify the new ASN.1?
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
1. I support Stewart's DISCUSS 2. I think that the title of the document is too general and should be more specific - e.g. 'Additional New ASN.1 Modules Using the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
For Stuart and Alexey: I raised very similar questions during the processing of <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1/history/>. This document is following the same pattern that document did.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Kathleen
Moriarty on 5-JAN-2011. You can found the review at:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
draft-turner-additional-new-asn-06-moriarty.txt
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Recuse