Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)
draft-turner-additional-new-asn-08
Yes
(Tim Polk)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)
Recuse
(Sean Turner)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-02)
Unknown
I support Stewart's Discuss. Although the resultant long list of "updates" may be a nuisance to some, it is important for the person who plans to update one of the other RFCs to know that this update exists. --- I am a bit confused why the document talks about RFCs using the old (1988) syntax, but only describes the updates from 2002 to 2008.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-01)
Unknown
I support Stewart's DISCUSS in regards to updating other RFCs, in particular RFC 5911, which defined earlier versions of new style ASN.1 modules. I don't have much opinion regarding Informational versa PS, but I think PS would have been just fine. Which tool was used to verify the new ASN.1?
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-03)
Unknown
1. I support Stewart's DISCUSS 2. I think that the title of the document is too general and should be more specific - e.g. 'Additional New ASN.1 Modules Using the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-03)
Unknown
IMO, this should be PS *and* formally "Update" these other RFCs. See Stuart's discuss. Section 6., paragraph 13: > -- Define each of the MAC-ALGOIRTHM objects to describe the Nit: s/MAC-ALGOIRTHM/MAC-ALGORITHM/ Section 2., paragraph 1: > Protocol designers can make use of the '08 ASN.1 contraints to define Nit: s/contraints/constraints/
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-01-31)
Unknown
For Stuart and Alexey: I raised very similar questions during the processing of <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1/history/>. This document is following the same pattern that document did.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-02)
Unknown
Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Kathleen
Moriarty on 5-JAN-2011. You can found the review at:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
draft-turner-additional-new-asn-06-moriarty.txt
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown