Security Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Algorithms
draft-turner-sha0-sha1-seccon-05
Yes
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Russ Housley)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)
Recuse
(Sean Turner)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-02)
Unknown
The first paragraph of Section 1 mentions the SHA-1 and SHA-2 family.
It then goes on to say that SHA-0 and SHA-1 are message digest
algorithms, but there is no further mention of SHA-2. I find that to be
a bit of a tease.
---
"HMAC" is used unexpanded.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-02-03)
Unknown
I support Adrian's DISCUSS. Reading the recommendations section and the supporting justification I rather have the feeling that the recommendations need to be 2119 capitalized and the document should be either standards track or BCP.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown