Skip to main content

JavaScript Session Establishment Protocol (JSEP)
draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2022-04-06
02 Murray Kucherawy Changed action holders to Eric Rescorla, Cullen Jennings, Justin Uberti
2022-04-06
02 Murray Kucherawy Comments from OPSDIR and GENART appear to be converging on the idea that there will be some revised text.
2022-04-06
02 (System) Changed action holders to Eric Rescorla, Cullen Jennings, Murray Kucherawy, Justin Uberti (IESG state changed)
2022-04-06
02 Murray Kucherawy IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised I-D Needed from Waiting for Writeup
2022-04-05
02 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call
2022-03-27
02 Joel Halpern Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Issues. Reviewer: Joel Halpern. Sent review to list.
2022-03-27
02 Qin Wu Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Qin Wu. Sent review to list.
2022-03-19
02 Yaron Sheffer Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer. Sent review to list.
2022-03-18
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Yaron Sheffer
2022-03-18
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Yaron Sheffer
2022-03-17
02 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2022-03-17
02 (System)
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We …
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Functions Operator has reviewed draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

We understand that this document doesn't require any registry actions.

While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, we do not object.

If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Michelle Thangtamsatid
IANA Services Specialist
2022-03-17
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2022-03-17
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2022-03-16
02 Barry Leiba Request for Last Call review by ARTART is assigned to Matthew Miller
2022-03-16
02 Barry Leiba Request for Last Call review by ARTART is assigned to Matthew Miller
2022-03-15
02 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Qin Wu
2022-03-15
02 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Qin Wu
2022-03-15
02 Cindy Morgan IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2022-03-15
02 Cindy Morgan
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2022-04-05):<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, …
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2022-04-05):<br><br>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, superuser@gmail.com
Reply-To: last-call@ietf.org
Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02.txt> (JavaScript Session Establishment Protocol (JSEP)) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Real-Time Communication in
WEB-browsers WG (rtcweb) to consider the following document: - 'JavaScript
Session Establishment Protocol (JSEP)'
  <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2022-04-05. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


  This document describes the mechanisms for allowing a JavaScript
  application to control the signaling plane of a multimedia session
  via the interface specified in the W3C RTCPeerConnection API and
  discusses how this relates to existing signaling protocols.

  This specification obsoletes RFC 8829.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.




2022-03-15
02 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2022-03-15
02 Cindy Morgan Last call announcement was changed
2022-03-15
02 Cindy Morgan Last call announcement was generated
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy Last call was requested
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy Ballot approval text was generated
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy Ballot writeup was generated
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy Last call announcement was generated
2022-03-14
02 Murray Kucherawy IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2022-03-09
02 Sean Turner
# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for JSEP (aka 8829). The …
# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for JSEP (aka 8829). The changes are noted in s1.3.

This I-D is Standards Track because JSEP is Standards Track.

Please note that this is a WG I-D despite the I-D's name; we adopted it as is and did not want to waste time submitting a draft-ietf-rtcweb version.

# Review and Consensus

This I-D was the sole topic of conversation at IETF 110 & 111. It was developed in close coordination with MMUSIC who produced a coordinated bis for RFC 8843, which is now published as RFC 9143.

The Shepherd does not believe there are any controversies. There is consensus as demonstrated during the WGLC that there is consensus to publish this document. I do not believe additional review is required.

# Intellectual Property

The Shepherd has confirmed that each author has stated that to their direct, personal knowledge any IPR related to this document has already been disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.

# Other Points

None.
2022-03-09
02 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2022-03-09
02 Sean Turner IESG state changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2022-03-09
02 Sean Turner
# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for JSEP (aka 8829). The …
# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for JSEP (aka 8829). The changes are noted in s1.3.

This I-D is Standards Track because JSEP is Standards Track.

Please note that this is a WG I-D despite the I-D's name; we adopted it as is and did not want to waste time submitting a draft-ietf-rtcweb version.

# Review and Consensus

This I-D was the sole topic of conversation at IETF 110 & 111. It was developed in close coordination with MMUSIC who produced a coordinated bis for RFC 8843, which is now published as RFC 9143.

The Shepherd does not believe there are any controversies. There is consensus as demonstrated during the WGLC that there is consensus to publish this document. I do not believe additional review is required.

# Intellectual Property

The Shepherd has confirmed that each author has stated that to their direct, personal knowledge any IPR related to this document has already been disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.

# Other Points

None.
2022-03-04
02 Sean Turner
# DRAFT - DRAFT

# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for …
# DRAFT - DRAFT

# Summary

Sean Turner is the document shepherd.
Murray Kucherawy is the responsible Area Director?

This document is a bis for JSEP (aka 8829). The changes are noted in s1.3.

This I-D is Standards Track because JSEP is Standards Track.

Please note that this is a WG I-D despite the I-D's name; we adopted it as is and did not want to waste time submitting a draft-ietf-rtcweb version.

# Review and Consensus

This I-D was the sole topic of conversation at IETF 110 & 111. It was developed in close coordination with MMUSIC who produced a coordinated bis for RFC 8843, which is now published as RFC 9143.

The Shepherd does not believe there are any controversies. There is consensus as demonstrated during the WGLC that there is consensus to publish this document. I do not believe additional review is required.

# Intellectual Property

The Shepherd has confirmed that each author has stated that to their direct, personal knowledge any IPR related to this document has already been disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.

# Other Points

None.

# DRAFT - DRAFT
2022-03-04
02 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2022-03-04
02 Sean Turner Notification list changed to sean@sn3rd.com because the document shepherd was set
2022-03-04
02 Sean Turner Document shepherd changed to Sean Turner
2022-03-03
02 Justin Uberti New version available: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02.txt
2022-03-03
02 (System) New version approved
2022-03-03
02 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name>
2022-03-03
02 Justin Uberti Uploaded new revision
2021-12-04
01 (System) Changed action holders to Murray Kucherawy (IESG state changed)
2021-12-04
01 Murray Kucherawy Responsible AD changed to Murray Kucherawy
2021-12-04
01 Murray Kucherawy IESG process started in state AD is watching
2021-12-04
01 Murray Kucherawy Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2021-12-04
01 Murray Kucherawy Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2021-10-28
01 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2021-10-25
01 Justin Uberti New version available: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-01.txt
2021-10-25
01 (System) New version approved
2021-10-25
01 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name>
2021-10-25
01 Justin Uberti Uploaded new revision
2021-09-19
00 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to WG Document from Adopted by a WG
2021-09-19
00 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to Adopted by a WG from Candidate for WG Adoption
2021-09-01
00 Sean Turner IETF WG state changed to Candidate for WG Adoption
2021-09-01
00 Sean Turner Notification list changed to none
2021-09-01
00 Sean Turner Changed group to Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers (RTCWEB)
2021-09-01
00 Sean Turner Changed stream to IETF
2021-07-10
00 Justin Uberti New version available: draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-00.txt
2021-07-10
00 (System) New version approved
2021-07-10
00 Justin Uberti Request for posting confirmation emailed  to submitter and authors: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Justin Uberti <justin@uberti.name>
2021-07-10
00 Justin Uberti Uploaded new revision