discreet VLAN-X AF
draft-umair-trill-discreet-vlanx-af-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Mohammed Umair | ||
| Last updated | 2015-03-24 (Latest revision 2014-09-20) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
htmlized
pdfized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-umair-trill-discreet-vlanx-af-00.txt
Abstract
According to RFC 7176, DRB on a link uses the Appointed Forwarders sub-TLV to inform other ISs on the link that they are the designated VLAN-x forwarder for one or more ranges of VLAN IDs. Appointed Forwarders sub-tlv has Appointed Information field which carries information about Appointee Nickname, Start.VLAN and End.VLAN. Both Start.VLAN and VLAN.end to the same value indicates a range of one VLAN ID, if they are different then the Appointed RBridge is AF for that range of VLAN ID's. If end-station's VLAN's are configured in discontiguous/discreet [1,3,5,7 etc] way then DRB has to send Appointed Information equal to number of Discreet VLAN's Appointed for a particular RBridge. The problem will worsen if huge number of endstation VLAN's are discreet. This paper is an attempt to handle such scenarios.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)