Quantum Safe Cryptography Key Information
draft-uni-qsckeys-00
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Christine van Vredendaal , Silvio Dragione , Basil Hess , Tamas Visgrady , Michael Osborne , Dieter Bong , Joppe W. Bos | ||
| Last updated | 2021-11-09 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-uni-qsckeys-dilithium, draft-uni-qsckeys-falcon, draft-uni-qsckeys-kyber, draft-uni-qsckeys-sphincsplus | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-uni-qsckeys-00
Internet Engineering Task Force C.v.V. Vredendaal, Ed.
Internet-Draft NXP Semiconductors
Intended status: Informational S.D. Dragone, Ed.
Expires: 13 May 2022 B.H. Hess, Ed.
T.V. Visegrady, Ed.
M.O. Osborne, Ed.
IBM Research GmbH
D.B. Bong, Ed.
Utimaco IS GmbH
J.B. Bos, Ed.
NXP Semiconductors
9 November 2021
Quantum Safe Cryptography Key Information
draft-uni-qsckeys-00
Abstract
This proposal addresses key identification, key serialization, and
key compression for Quantum Safe Cryptographic (QSC) algorithms
currently under evaluation in the NIST Post Quantum Cryptography
(PQC) process. The purpose of this proposal is to simplify the
management of key material for algorithms as they evolve through
standardization phases into production. Early definition of key
material standards will help expedite the adoption of new quantum
safe algorithms at the same time as improving interoperability
between implementations and minimizing divergence across standards.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 May 2022.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Algorithm Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Algorithm and Algorithm Parameter Object Identifier . . . 4
2. Overview of PQC algorithm and parameter OIDs . . . . . . . . 5
2.1. Key Formats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2. Public Key Format based on RFC5480 . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3. Overview of Memo Definitions - PQC Key Formats . . . . . 8
3. Classic McEliece . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.4. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4. Kyber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.5. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5. NTRU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.4. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6. SABER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
6.4. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7. CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
7.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding Option 1 . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.5. Secret Key Partial Encoding Option 2 . . . . . . . . . . 30
7.6. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
8. FALCON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
8.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
8.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
8.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8.4. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9. Rainbow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9.2. Key Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.3. Secret Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
9.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
9.5. Public Key Full Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
10. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Appendix A. Additional Stuff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
1. Introduction
QSC algorithms being standardized in the NIST PQC Process have
evolved through several rounds and iterations. Keys are neither
easily identifiable nor compatible across rounds. It is also
expected that algorithms will evolve after final candidates have been
selected. The lack of binary compatibility between algorithm
versions and variants means that it is important to clearly identify
key material. Parallel to the NIST process, industry is evaluating
the impact of adopting new PQC algorithms, in particular key
management. Here it is important to define and standardize key
serialization and encoding formats. Finally, we have seen that many
platforms and protocols are very constrained when it comes to the
amount of memory or space available for key objects. This makes it
important to define and standardize key compression formats. This
proposal addresses aspects of key identification, key serialization,
and key compression for NIST PQC candidates.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] .
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
1.2. Algorithm Identification
Algorithm identification is important for several reasons:
* Managing a smooth transition from early adoption algorithm
versions to production versions where there is no compatibility.
* Supporting different algorithm versions from different NIST rounds
* Identifying different key serialization strategies
* Identifying compressed and uncompressed keys
The current standardization of quantum-safe algorithms does not
address the definition of serialization structures for keys. As a
result, it has become commonplace for the cryptographic community
working on and with these algorithms to define their own approaches.
This leads to proprietary and internal representations for key
material. This has certain advantages in terms of ease of
experimentation while focusing on finding the best-performing QSC
algorithms. In terms of longer-term support where algorithm versions
change this is a problem. For the purpose of temporarily supporting
ongoing experimentation with opaque blobs, for example in simple
"classic key-emulating" test applications, such as TLS, this document
specifies a temporary but suboptimal key format in section 2.1,
mainly to establish a base of reference for as long as
experimentation is ongoing. This is referenced as the 'raw key
material' representation. At the same time, this proposal documents
in section 2.2 below, a long-term key representation format useful to
address the goals outlined in 1.1. This proposal contains all
information required to document and transition from one version of
key material representation to another.
1.3. Algorithm and Algorithm Parameter Object Identifier
Algorithm and algorithm parameter information shall have ASN.1 type
AlgorithmIdentifier as given in [RFC5280] and shall be extended by an
pqcAlgorithmParameterName type in the optional parameters field:
AlgorithmIdentifier ::= SEQUENCE {
algorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER, - OID: algorithm and algo parameter
parameters pqcAlgorithmParameterName OPTIONAL
}
pqcAlgorithmParameterName ::= PrintableString
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
2. Overview of PQC algorithm and parameter OIDs
Each PQC algorithm has its own specific parameters. Different
parameter sets provide different levels of security within one
algorithm. This memo attributes a name and an OID to the different
security level NIST round 3 parameter sets. The following table
gives an overview of the possible OIDs in the algorithm field and
possible parameters set names in the parameters field of the
AlgorithmIdentifier type. Each name or OID represents a single
parameter set of given security. Details can be found in the
individual PQC algorithm chapters.
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| Classic McEliece (PQC KEM) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| qc-kem-mceliece (PQC KEM) |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*..pqc-kem-mceliece .. } |
| |dot | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| Crystals-Kyber (PQC KEM) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| kyber-512-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-512-r3 } |
| |dot. | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.2.2 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| kyber-512-90s-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-512-90s-r3} |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.2.2 |
|---------------+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| kyber-768-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-768-r3 } |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.3.3 |
|---------------+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| kyber-768-90s-r3 |
|---------------+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-768-90s-r3 } |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.3.3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| kyber-1024-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-1024-r3 } |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.4.4 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| kyber-1024-90s-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-kyber kyber-1024-90s-r3} |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.4.4 |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| NTRU (PQC KEM) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| ntruhps2048509-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| { pqc-kem-ntru ntruhps2048509 } |
| |dot | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| ntruhps204867 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| { ..*.. pqc-kem-ntru ntruhps204867 |
| |dot. | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| ntruhps4096821 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| { ..*.. pqc-kem-ntru ntruhps4096821 } |
| |dot | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| ntruhrss701 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| { ..*.. pqc-kem-ntru ntruhrss701 } |
| |dot | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| SABER ((PQC KEM) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| pqc-kem-saber |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-kem-saber .. } |
| |Dot | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| Crystals-Dilithium (PQC Digital Signature) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| dilithium-4x4-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1|{..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-4x4-r3} |
| |dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.4.4 |
|---------------+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| dilithium-4x4-aes-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-4x4-aes-r3} |
| | dot | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| dilithium-6x5-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-6x5-r3} |
| | Dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.6.5 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| dilithium-6x5-aes-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-6x5-aes-r3} |
| | Dot | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| dilithium-8x7-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-8x7-r3} |
| |Dot | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.8.7 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| dilithium-8x7-aes-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-dilithium dilithium-8x7-aes-r3} |
| |dot. | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| FALCON (PQC Digital Signature) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| falcon512-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-falcon falcon512-r3} |
| |dot. | |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| falcon1024-r3 |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-falcon falcon1024-r3} |
| |Dot | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| Rainbow (PQC Digital Signature) |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
| pqc-ds-rainbow |
|---------+-----+-----------------------------------------------|
| |ASN.1| {..*.. pqc-ds-rainbow .. } |
| |dot. | |
|=========+=====+===============================================|
Figure 1
2.1. Key Formats
The Secret Key Format defined is from PKCS#8 [RFC5208] . PKCS#8
PrivateKeyInfo is defined as:
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
PrivateKeyInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER -- PKCS#8 syntax ver
privateKeyAlgorithm AlgorithmIdentifier -- see chapter above
privateKey OCTET STRING, -- see chapter below
attributes [0] IMPLICIT Attributes OPTIONAL
}
Distributing a PQC private key requires a PKCS#8 PrivateKeyInfo with
a joined PQC algorithm and algorithm parameter OID in the algorithm
field of AlgorithmIdentifier and a PQC algorithm specific private key
object in the privateKey field of PrivateKeyInfo. Both objects are
defined in the specific algorithm sections of this document. For an
overview see tables above and below.
2.2. Public Key Format based on [RFC5480]
RFC5480 subjectPublicKeyInfo is defined in as:
subjectPublicKeyInfo := SEQUENCE {
algorithm AlgorithmIdentifier -- see chapter above
subjectPublicKey BIT STRING -- see chapter below
}
Distributing a PQC public key requires a [RFC5480]
subjectPublicKeyInfo with a joined PQC algorithm and algorithm
parameter OID in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier and a PQC
algorithm specific public key object in the subjectPublicKey field of
subjectPublicKeyInfo. Both objects are defined in the specific
algorithm sections of this document. For an overview see tables
above and below.
2.3. Overview of Memo Definitions - PQC Key Formats
The privateKey field in the PrivateKeyInfo type [RFC5480] is an OCTET
STRING whose contents are the value of the private key. The
interpretation of the content differs from PQC algorithm to
algorithm. The subjectPublicKey field in the subjectPublicKeyInfo
type RFC 5480 [RFC5480] is a BIT STRING whose contents are the value
of the public key. Here also the interpretation of the content
differs from PQC algorithm to algorithm.
For an NTRU private key, for example, the content needs to be
interpreted according to the NTRUPrivateKey type and for an NTRU
public key the content needs to be interpreted according to the
NTRUPublicKey type; both are defined in the NTRU chapter below.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
3. Classic McEliece
Classic McEliece is an IND-CCA2-secure key encapsulation mechanism
(KEM). The KEM is built conservatively from a PKE designed for OW-
CPA security, namely Niederreiter's dual version of McEliece's PKE
using binary Goppa codes. Project Website:
https://classic.mceliece.org/index.html NIST Round 3 Submission:
https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-quantum-
cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/Classic-McEliece-
Round3.zip
3.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Classic McEliece uses OIDs to identify parameters sets for different
security strengths.
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece348864-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece348864-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=12,n=3488,t=64 |
| | f(z)=z^{12} + z^3 + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{64} + y^3 + y + z |
| | (mu; nu)=(0; 0) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=2720 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece348864f-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece348864f-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=12,n=3488,t=64 |
| | f(z)=z^{12} + z^3 + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{64} + y^3 + y + z |
| | (mu; nu)=(32;64) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=2720 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece460896-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece460896-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=4608,t=96, |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{96} + y^{10} + y^9 + y^6 + 1|
| | (mu; nu)=(0; 0) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=3360 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece460896f-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece460896f-r3 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=4608,t=96, |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{96} + y^{10} + y^9 + y^6 + 1|
| | (mu; nu)=(32; 64) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=3360 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece6688128-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece6688128-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=6688,t=128 |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{128} + y^7 + y^2 + y + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(0; 0) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=5024 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece6688128f-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece6688128f-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=6688,t=128 |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{128} + y^7 + y^2 + y + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(32; 64) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=5024 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece6960119-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece6960119-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=6960,t=119 |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{119} + y^8 + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(0; 0) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=5413 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece6960119f-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece6960119f-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=6960,t=119 |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{119} + y^8 + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(32; 64) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=5413 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece8192128-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece8192128-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=8192,t=128 |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{128} + y^7 + y^2 + y + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(0; 0) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=6528 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| mceliece8192128f-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. mceliece8192128f-r3} |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | m=13,n=8192,t=128 |
| | f(z)=z^{13} + z^4 + z^3 + z + 1 |
| | F(y)=y^{128} + y^7 + y^2 + y + 1 |
| | (mu; nu)=(32; 64) |
| | l = 256 |
| | k=n-mt=6528 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 2
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
3.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of * T: mt x k matrix Each row
of T is represented as a ceiling(k/8)-byte string, and the public key
is represented as the mt*ceiling(k/8)-byte concatenation of these
strings. Secret key. The secret key consists of five parameters:
* delta: nonce
* C : column selections
* g : monic irreducible polynomial
* alpha: field orderings
* s : uniform random n-bit string
The size necessary to hold all secret key elements accounts to
ceiling(l / 8) + [ceiling(nu / 8) | 8] + ceiling(m / 8) +
ceiling((2*m - 1) * 2*m - 4) + ceiling(n / 8) bytes. The resulting
public key and private key sizes can be found in the table below.
|=====================+=================+================|
| Parameter Set. | Size of the | Size of the |
| | public key | secret key |
| | in bytes. | in bytes |
|=====================+=================+================|
| mceliece348864-r3 | 261120 | 6492 |
| mceliece348864f-r3 | 261120 | 6492 |
| mceliece460896-r3 | 524160 | 13608 |
| mceliece460896f-r3 | 524160 | 13608 |
| mceliece6688128-r3 | 1044992 | 13932 |
| mceliece6688128f-r3 | 1044992 | 13932 |
| mceliece6960119-r3 | 1047319 | 13948 |
| mceliece6960119f-r3 | 1047319 | 13948 |
| mceliece8192128-r3 | 1357824 | 14120 |
| mceliece8192128f-r | 1357824 | 14120 |
|=====================+=================+================|
Figure 3
3.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
Distributing a Classic McEliece private key with PKCS#8 involves
including:
* mceliece{n}{t}[f]-r3 in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* McEliecePrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET
STRING.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
When a Classic McEliece public key is included in the distributed
PrivateKeyInfo, the PublicKey field in McEliecePrivateKey is used
(see description of McEliecePublicKey below). ASN.1 Encoding for a
Classic McEliece private key for fully populated:
McEliecePrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
Version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
delta OCTET STRING, -- nonce
C OCTET STRING, -- column selections
g OCTET STRING, -- monic irreducible polynomial
alpha OCTET STRING, -- field orderings
s OCTET STRING, -- random n-bit string
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT McEliecePublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
3.4. Public Key Full Encoding
Classic McEliece Public Key Format
McEliecePublicKey ::= SEQUENCE {
T OCTET STRING -- public key
}
4. Kyber
Kyber is an IND-CCA2-secure key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), whose
security is based on the hardness of solving the learning-with-errors
(LWE) problem over module lattices. Project Website: https://pq-
crystals.org/kyber/index.shtml NIST Round 3 Submission:
https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-quantum-
cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/Kyber-Round3.zip
4.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Kyber uses OIDs to identify parameters sets for different security
strengths.
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-512-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-512-90s-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.2.2 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=2 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=3 |
| | nu_2=2 |
| | (d_u, d_v)=(10, 4) |
| | delta=2^{-139} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-512-90s-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-512-90s-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.2.2 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=2 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=3 |
| | nu_2=2 |
| | (d_u, d_v)=(10, 4) |
| | delta=2^{-139} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-768-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-768-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.3 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=3 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=2 |
| | nu_2=2 |
| | (d_u, d_v)=(10, 4) |
| | delta=2^{-164} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-768-90s-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-768-90s-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.3.3 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=3 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=2 |
| | nu_2=2 |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| | (d_u, d_v)=(10, 4) |
| | delta=2^{-164} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-1024-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-1024-r3} |
| | 11.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.4.4 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=4 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=2 |
| | nu_2=2 |
| | (d_u, d_v)=(11, 5) |
| | delta=2^{-174} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| kyber-1024-90s-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. kyber-1024-90s-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.4.4 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | n= 256, |
| | k=4 |
| | q=3329 |
| | nu_1=2 |
| | nu_2=2 |
| | (d_u, d_v)=(11, 5) |
| | delta=2^{-174} |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 4
The '90s' variants listed above differ in the symmetric primitives
that are used internally. By default, Kyber uses SHAKE-128 as XOF,
SHA3 for hashing and SHAKE-256 for PRF and KDF. The '90s' variants
use AES256CTR to construct a XOF and a PRF, SHA2 for hashing and
SHAKE-256 as KDF. The main advantage of the '90s' variants is that
they benefit from the ready availability of hardware AES and SHA2 co-
processors. While the parameters listed in the table are the same,
the key-pairs will not be compatible with the '90s' variants.
4.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of two parameters:
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
* t: encoded vector A*s+e, where A is a public matrix over a
constant-sized polynomial ring, s and e are vectors over the same
ring.
* rho: public seed (32 bytes)
The size necessary to hold all public key elements is 12*k*n/8+32
bytes. Secret key. The secret key consists of 3 parameters:
* s: encoded sample from a centered binomial distribution B_nu1
(12*k*n/8 bytes)
* z: a nonce (32 bytes)
* H(pk): hashed public key (32 bytes). Kyber uses SHA3-256 as H by
default. The '90s' variants use SHA256 instead.
If the secret key is fully populated, it consists of 3 parameters.
The size necessary to hold all secret key elements accounts to
12*k*n/8+64 bytes, not counting the optional public key. The
resulting public key and private key sizes are shown in the following
table.
|==========================+=========+==========+=========|
| Algorithm OID | Public | Secret | Secret |
| | Key | Key | Key |
| | | |(partial)|
|==========================+=========+==========+=========|
| kyber512-r3 / | 800 | 832 | 32 |
| kyber512-90s-r3 | | | |
|--------------------------|---------|----------|---------|
| kyber768-r3 / | 1184 | 1216 | 32 |
| kyber768-90s-r3 | | | |
|--------------------------|--------------------|---------|
| kyber1024-r3 / | 1568 | 1600 | 32 |
| kyber1024-90s-r3 | | | |
|==========================+=========+==========+=========|
Figure 5
4.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
Distributing a Kyber private key with PKCS#8 requires:
* kyber-(n*k)-r3 in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* KyberPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET STRING.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
When a Kyber public key is included in the distributed
PrivateKeyInfo, the PublicKey field in KyberPrivateKey is used (see
description of KyberPublicKey below). The ASN.1 encoding for a Kyber
private key is defined as follows:
KyberPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
Version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
nonce OCTET STRING, -- z
s OCTET STRING, -- sample s
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT KyberPublicKey OPTIONAL,
-- see next section
hpk OCTET STRING -- H(pk)
}
4.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding
The partially populated parameter set uses of the fact that some
parameters can be regenerated. In this case, only the initial seed
'd' (nonce) is stored and used to regenerate the full key. Partially
encoded keys use the same ASN.1 structure as the fully polulated
keys, simply with the regenerated fields set to EMPTY. Compared to
the approach of a single definition and setting the regenratable
fields as OPTIONAL, this approach significantly simplifies the
processing os ASN.1 frames and validation of the partial encoding.
The ASN.1 format for the partially populated versions is the same as
for the fully populated version. The ASN.1 encoding for this variant
(z replaced by d) is defined as follows:
KyberPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
nonce OCTET STRING, -- d
s OCTET STRING, -- EMPTY
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT KyberPublicKey OPTIONAL,
-- see next section
hpk OCTET STRING -- EMPTY
}
4.5. Public Key Full Encoding
The vector 't' is encoded using the function Encode_12, defined as
the inverse of Decode_12 as defined in Algorithm 3 of the Kyber round
3 specification. The size of t is 12*k*n/8 bytes. The seed 'rho' is
a 32 byte OCTET STRING.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
KyberPublicKey ::= SEQUENCE {
t OCTET STRING,
rho OCTET STRING
}
5. NTRU
NTRU is a key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), whose security is based
on the hardness of solving the Shortest Vector Problem in NTRU
lattices. Project Website: https://ntru.org/ NIST Round 3
Submission: https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-quantum-
cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/NTRU-Round3.zip
5.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Below are the NTRU parameter sets. Note that the definition of
local/non-local security is out of scope for this document, but can
be found in the NTRU NIST Round 3 Submission.
|=========================+=====================================|
| ntruhps2048509-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. ntruhps2048509-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n= 509 |
| | Polynomial Phin= (xn - 1)/(x-1 |
| | Polynomial Phi1=(x-1) |
| | Modulus p=3 |
| | Modulus q= 2048 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| ntruhps2048677-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. ntruhps2048677-r3} |
| | <. > |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 (1) see spec. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n= 677 |
| | Polynomial Phin= (xn - 1)/(x-1) |
| | Polynomial Phi1=(x-1) |
| | Modulus p=3 |
| | Modulus q= 2048 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| ntruhps4096821-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| Parameter OID | {..*.. ntruhps4096821-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 (1) see spec. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n= 821 |
| | Polynomial Phin= (xn - 1)/(x-1) |
| | Polynomial Phi1=(x-1) |
| | Modulus p=3 |
| | Modulus q= 4096 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| ntruhrss701-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. ntruhrss701-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 (3) see spec. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n= 701 |
| | Polynomial Phin= (xn - 1)/(x-1) |
| | Polynomial Phi1=(x-1) |
| | Modulus p=3 |
| | Modulus q= 8192 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 6
The parameter sets differ in the degree of the polynomial n and the
modulus q.
5.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of a single parameter :
* a polynomial h that satisfies h?f=3?g in the ring Rq=Z[x]/(q,
Phi1?Phin).
This means there are n - 1 coefficients of size at most q in the
public key, and the size necessary to store the polynomial is
therefore is ceiling((n - 1)?log2(q)/8) bytes. The resulting sizes
for the parameter sets can be found in the Table below. Secret key.
The secret key consists of 4 parameters:
* a polynomial f that is a ternary (coefficients fi are in {-1, 0,
1}) polynomial of degree n - 2, with the additional property that
∑_(i=0)^(n-3) f_i?? f?_(i+1)≥0,
* a polynomial fp that satisfies f?fp=1 in the ring Rq=Z[x]/(3,
Phin),
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
* a polynomial hq that satisfies h?hq=1 in the ring Rq=Z[x]/(q,
Phin), and
* a seed=fg_bits || prf_key=f_bits || g_bits || prf_key containing
the randomness for the key sampling and the implicit rejection
mechanism. Optionally implementers may expand this from a 32-byte
seed.
This means there are 2 polynomials, f and fp, having n - 1
coefficients with absolute value at most 1 in the secret key. For
these polynomials, the packing algorithm in Section 1.8.7 of the
Specification allows to pack 5 coefficients in a byte, so the storage
requirement to store each is ceiling((n - 1)/5) bytes. Additionally
hq is part of the secret key, which requires the same storage size as
that of the public key h, i.e. ceiling((n - 1)?log2(q)/8) bytes. For
the seed bytes, the specification recommends:
* >f_bits having n - 1 bytes,
* >g_bits having n - 1 bytes for ntruhrss701, ceiling(30/8?(n-1))
bytes for the other parameter sets,
* prf_key having 32 bytes.
Implementers may choose to expand the seed from one 32-byte seed.
The resulting sizes for the parameter sets can be found in the
Table below. Where the seed expansion is omitted, the 32-byte seed
must be replaced by key_seed_bits=sample_key_bits+prf_key_bits. The
impact of these options are indicated as 32-byte seed/expanded seed
in the Table below. Parameter Set Size of the public key in bytes
Size of the secret key in bytes
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=====================+==============================|
| ntruhps2048509-r3 |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| Public Key (Bytes) | 699 |
| seed/expanded seed | 935 / 3348 |
| f,fp,hq,seed | 102,102,699,32/2445 |
|=====================+==============================|
| ntruhps2048677-r3 |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| Public Key (Bytes) | 699 |
| seed/expanded seed | 935 / 3348 |
| f,fp,hq,seed | 102,102,699,32/2445 |
|=====================+==============================|
| ntruhps2048677-r3 |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| Public Key (Bytes) | 930 |
| seed/expanded seed | 1234 / 4445 |
| (f,fp,hq,seed) | 136,136,930,32/3243 |
|=====================+==============================|
| ntruhps4096821-r3 |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| Public Key (Bytes) | 1230 |
| seed/expanded seed | 1590 / 5485 |
| (f,fp,hq,seed) | 164,164,1230,32/3927 |
|=====================+==============================|
| ntruhrss701-r3 |
|---------------------|------------------------------|
| Public Key (Bytes) | 1138 |
| seed/expanded seed | 1450 / 2850 |
| (f,fp,hq,seed) | 140,140,1138,32/1432 |
|=====================+==============================|
Figure 7
5.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
An NTRU private key encoded according with PKCS#8 MUST include the
following two fields:
* ntruhps-(size)-r3 / ntruhrss701-r3 in the algorithm field of
AlgorithmIdentifier
* NTRUPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET STRING.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
When a NTRU public key is included in the distributed PrivateKeyInfo,
the PublicKey field in NTRUPrivateKey is used (see description of
NTRUPublicKey below). An NTRU secret key contains f, fp and hq, as
well as a seed. The octet string format indicates the length of the
string to follow, and indicates whether the seed or expanded seed is
used.
NTRUPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
f OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial f
fp OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial gp
hq OCTET STRING, -- mod q integer polynomial hq
seed OCTET STRING, -- fg_bits/prf_bits (or their seed)
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT NTRUPublicKey OPTIONAL -- see next section
}
5.4. Public Key Full Encoding
From the NTRU specification, the public key contains h. Each
coefficient of h is encoded as an ? bit sequence, where ?=ceiling((n
- 1)?log2(q)). Coefficients are then concatenated (two's complement,
big endian convention). The final bit string is zero padded to fit
into a byte sequence. NTRUPublicKey := SEQUENCE { h OCTET STRING --
integer polynomial h }
6. SABER
SABER is a family of cryptographic primitives that rely on the
hardness of the Module Learning with Rounding problem (M-LWR).
Project Website: https://www.esat.kuleuven.be/cosic/pqcrypto/saber/
NIST Round 3 Submission: https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/
post-quantum-cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/SABER-
Round3.zip
6.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Saber has three parameter sets shown in the table below
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=========================+=====================================|
| LightSaber-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. lightsaber-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Degree n= 256 |
| | rank of the module ?= 2 |
| | binomial distribution with u=10 |
| | Modulus q=2^{13} and p=2^{10} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Saber-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. saber-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Degree n= 256 |
| | rank of the module ?= 3 |
| | binomial distribution with u=8 |
| | Modulus q=2^{13} and p=2^{10} |
|=========================+=====================================|
| FireSaber-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. firesaber-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Degree n= 256 |
| | rank of the module ?= 4 |
| | binomial distribution with u=6 |
| | Modulus q=2^{13} and p=2^{10} |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 8
The rank of the module is denoted ? and differs per parameter set.
6.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of the following two parameters:
* >seed_A: public seed (32 bytes)
* polynomials of degree 256 with 10-bit integer coefficients denoted
by vector b.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
This means the size of the public key can be stored using
?*256*10+256 bits. The size of the public key as used in the three
parameter sets can be found in the Table below.
Secret key. The secret key s consists of three parameters:
* a 256-bit uniform random value z
* ? polynomials of degree 256 with 13-bit integer coefficients
denoted by s
* H(pk): hashed public key (32 bytes)
This means the secret key can be stored using 512+?*256*13 bits. The
size of the secret key as used in the three parameter sets can be
found in the Table below.
|==========================+=========+==========|
| Algorithm | Public | Secret |
| | Key | Key |
| | Length | Length |
|==========================+=========+==========+
| LightSaber-r3 | 672 | 896 |
| Saber-r3 | 992 | 1312 |
| FireSaber-r3 | 1312 | 1728 |
|==========================+=========+==========|
Figure 9
6.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
A SABER private key encoded according with PKCS#8 MUST include the
following two fields:
* one of the three algorithm alternatives {LightSaber-r3, Saber-r3,
FireSaber-r3} in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* SABERPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET STRING.
When a SABER public key is included in the distributed
PrivateKeyInfo, the PublicKey field in SABERPrivateKey is used (see
the description below).
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
SABERPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
z OCTET STRING, -- 32-byte random value z
s OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial s
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT SABERPublicKey OPTIONAL,
-- see next section
hpk OCTET STRING -- H(pk)
}
6.4. Public Key Full Encoding
SABERPublicKey := SEQUENCE {
seed_A OCTET STRING, -- 32-byte seed
b OCTET STRING -- short integer polynomial b
}
7. CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM
Dilithium is a digital signature scheme that is based on the hardness
of lattice problems over module lattices. Project Website:
https://pq-crystals.org/dilithium/index.shtml NIST Round 3 Submission
(version 3.1): https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-
quantum-cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/Dilithium-
Round3.zip https://pq-crystals.org/dilithium/data/dilithium-
specification-round3-20210208.pdf
7.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Dilithium uses OIDs to identify parameters sets for different
security strengths.
|=========================+=====================================|
| dilithium-4x4-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-4x4-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.4.4 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 2 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n +1) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: tau=39 |
| | challenge entropy=192 |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| | gamma coefficient range: gamma1=2^17|
| | low-order rounding range: gamma2=(q-|
| | 1)/88 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=2 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(4,4) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=80 |
| | Repetitions=4.25 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| dilithium-4x4-aes-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-4x4-aes-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 2 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n + 1 ) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: tau=39 |
| | challenge entropy=192 |
| | y coefficient range: gamma1=2^17 |
| | low-order rounding range:gamma2=(q- |
| | -1)/88 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=2 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(4,4) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=80 |
| | Repetitions=4.25 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| dilithium-6x5-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-6x5-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.6.5 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n + 1 ) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: ?=49 |
| | challenge entropy=225 |
| | y coefficient range: gamma1=2^19 |
| | low-order rounding range:gamma2=(q- |
| | -1)/32 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=4 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(6,5) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=55 |
| | Repetitions=5.1 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| dilithium-6x5-aes-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-6x5-aes-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n +1 ) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: tau=49 |
| | challenge entropy=225 |
| | y coefficient range: gamma1=2^19 |
| | low-order rounding range:gamma2=(q- |
| | -1)/32 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=4 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(6,5) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=55 |
| | Repetitions=5.1 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| dilithium-8x7-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-8x7-r3} |
| | 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.7.8.7 |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n + 1 ) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: tau=60 |
| | challenge entropy=257 |
| | y coefficient range: ?1=2^19 |
| | low-order rounding range:gamma2=(q- |
| | -1)/32 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=2 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(8,7) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=75 |
| | Repetitions=3.85 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| dilithium-8x7-aes-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. dilithium-8x7-aes-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Polynomial Ring Zq[x]/( x^n + 1 ) |
| | Dimension/Degree n= 256 |
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
| | Modulus q=8380417 |
| | Dropped bits from t: d=13 |
| | # of +-1's in c: tau=60 |
| | challenge entropy=257 |
| | y coefficient range: gamma1=2^19 |
| | low-order rounding range:gamma2=(q- |
| | -1)/32 |
| | Secret Key Range (nu)=2 |
| | Dimensions of A: (k,l)=(8,7) |
| | Max # of 1's in the hint h: w=75 |
| | Repetitions=3.85 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 10
The aes variants listed above differ from the other variants in that
they use AES, rather than SHAKE internally to expand the key
parameters from an initial seed. While the parameters listed in the
table are the same, the key-pairs will not be compatible with the
'aes' variants.
7.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of two parameters:
* rho: nonce
* t1: a vector encoded in 320*k bytes
The size necessary to hold all public key elements accounts to
32+320*k bytes.
Secret key. The secret key consists of 6 parameters:
* rho: nonce
* K: a key/seed/D
* tr: PRF bytes
* s1: vector (L)
* s2: vector (K)
* t0: k polynomials
If the secret key is fully populated, it consists of 6 parameters.
The size necessary to hold all secret key elements accounts to
32+32+32+32*[(k+l)*ceiling(log(2*nu+1))+13*k] bytes. The resulting
public key and private key sizes can be found in the table below.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=========================+========+========+=========+=========|
| Algorithm | Public | Secret | Partial | Partial |
| | Key | Key SK | SK (V1) | SK (V2) |
| | Length | Length | Length | Length |
|=========================+========+========+=========+=========+
| dilithium-4x4-r3 | 1312 | 2528 | 64 | 32 |
| dilithium-4x4-aes-r3 | 1312 | 2528 | 64 | 32 |
| dilithium-6x5-r3 | 1952 | 4000 | 64 | 32 |
| dilithium-6x5-aes-r3 | 1952 | 4000 | 64 | 32 |
| dilithium-8x7-r3 | 2596 | 4864 | 64 | 32 |
| dilithium-8x7-aes-r3 | 2592 | 4864 | 64 | 32 |
|=========================+========+========+=========+=========|
Figure 11
7.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
A Dilithium private key encoded according with PKCS#8 MUST include
the following two fields:
* dilithium-(kxl)-r3 in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* DilithiumPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET
STRING.
Dilithium public key are optionally distributed in the PublicKey
field of the PrivateKeyInfo structure.
ASN.1 Encoding for a Dilithium private key for fully populated:
DilithiumPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
nonce BIT STRING, -- rho
key BIT STRING, -- key/seed/D
tr BIT STRING, -- PRF bytes (CRH in spec)
s1 BIT STRING, -- vector(L)
s2 BIT STRING, -- vector(K)
t0 BIT STRING,
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT DilithiumPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
7.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding Option 1
In option 1 of Dilithium partial encoding the rho (nonce) and the
seed (key) are used to regenerate the full key. Note: There are a
number of alternative ways to encode a partially filled structure
that include defining fields as optional and defining fields as
'EMPTY'. As an example partial RSA keys are encoded using EMPTY
fields. It can be argued that defining fields as EMPTY significantly
simplifies the implementation of parsing ASN.1 frames. The ASN.1
format for the partially populated versions is the same as for the
fully populated version. The ASN.1 encoding for the first variant
(rho and seed) is defined as follows:
DilithiumPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
nonce BIT STRING, -- rho
key BIT STRING, -- key/seed/D
tr BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
s1 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
s2 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
t0 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT DilithiumPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
7.5. Secret Key Partial Encoding Option 2
In option 2 of Dilithium partial encoding only zeta (nonce) is used
to regenerate the full key. The ASN.1 encoding for this is defined
as follows:
DilithiumPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
nonce BIT STRING, -- zeta
key BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
tr BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
s1 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
s2 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
t0 BIT STRING, -- EMPTY
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT DilithiumPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
7.6. Public Key Full Encoding
Components are individual OCTET STRINGs, without unused bits, encoded
with the exact size. There is no removal of leading zeroes.
DilithiumPublicKey ::= SEQUENCE {
rho OCTET STRING,
t1 OCTET STRING
}
8. FALCON
FALCON is a lattice-based signature scheme that uses the short
integer solution problem (SIS) over NTRU lattices as its underlying
hard problem. Project Website https://falcon-sign.info/ NIST Round 3
Submission https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-quantum-
cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/Falcon-Round3.zip
8.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=========================+=====================================|
| falcon512-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. falcon512-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n = 512 |
| | Polynomial Phi = 1+X{n} |
| | Modulus q = 12289 |
| | Max. signature square norm |
| | floor (beta2) = 34034726 |
| | Standard deviation = 165.736617183 |
| | sigmamax = 1.8205 |
| | sigmamin = 1.27783369 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| falcon1024-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. falcon1024-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Dimension/Degree n = 1024 |
| | Polynomial Phi = 1+X{n} |
| | Modulus q = 12289 |
| | Max. signature square norm |
| | floor (beta2) = 34034726 |
| | Standard deviation = 168.388571447 |
| | sigmamax = 1.8205 |
| | sigmamin = 1.298280334 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 12
8.2. Key Details
The FALCON secret key contains the key components f, g and F. Each
coefficient of f and g is encoded over a fixed number of bits, which
depends on the degree of f and g: 6 bits each for degree 512
(parameter name = falcon512-r3) and 5 bits each for degree 1024
(parameter name = falcon1024-r3). Coefficients of F use 8 bits each,
regardless of its degree. Each coefficient uses signed encoding,
with two's complement for negative values. Moreover, the minimal
value is forbidden, e.g. when using degree 512, the valid range for a
coefficient of f or g is ?31 to +31; ?32 is not allowed.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|==========================+=========+==========|
| Algorithm OID | Params | Secret |
| | | Key |
| | | Length |
|==========================+=========+==========+
| falcon512-r3 | f=384 | 1280 |
| | g=384 | |
| | F=512 | |
|--------------------------+---------+----------|
| falcon1024-r3 | f=640 | 2304 |
| | g=640 | |
| | F=1024 | |
|==========================+=========+==========+
Figure 13
8.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
Encoding a FALCON private key with PKCS#8 must include the following
two fields:
* falcon-(degree)-r3 in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* FALCONPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET
STRING.
When a FALCON public key is included in the distributed
PrivateKeyInfo, the PublicKey field in FALCONPrivateKey is used (see
description of FALCONPublicKey below). ASN.1 Encoding for a FALCON
private key:
FALCONPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v2(1)} -- syntax version 2 (round 3)
f OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial f
g OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial g
F OCTET STRING, -- short integer polynomial F
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT FALCONPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
8.4. Public Key Full Encoding
The FALCON public key contains a series of coefficients encoded into
parameter h. Each coefficient of h is encoded as a 14 bit sequence
(since q = 12289, 14 bits per coefficient are used). Coefficients
are then concatenated. The final bit string is zero padded to fit
into a byte sequence.
|==========================+=========+==========|
| Algorithm | Public Key Length |
|==========================+====================+
| falcon512-r3 | 896 |
|--------------------------+--------------------|
| falcon1024-r3 | 1792 |
|==========================+====================|
Figure 14
FALCONPublicKey := SEQUENCE {
h OCTET STRING -- integer polynomial h
}
9. Rainbow
Rainbow is a multivariate-based signature scheme that relies on the
hardness of solving a set of random multivariate quadratic systems.
Project Website: https://www.pqcrainbow.org/ NIST Round Submission:
https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/post-quantum-
cryptography/documents/round-3/submissions/Rainbow-Round3.zip
9.1. Algorithm Parameter Identifiers
The following tables shows Rainbow parameter sets.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=========================+=====================================|
| rainbowI-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. rainbowI-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 1 / Level 2 see spec. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Field F = GF(16)[2] |
| | u = 2 |
| | v1 = 36 |
| | o1 = 32 |
| | o2 = 32 |
| | n = v2 = 100[3] |
| | m = n - v1 = 64 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| rainbowIII-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. rainbowIII-r3 |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 3 / Level 4. See spec. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Field F = GF(256) |
| | u = 2 |
| | v1 = 68 |
| | o1 = 32 |
| | o2 = 48 |
| | n = v2 = 148 |
| | m = n - v1 = 80 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| rainbowV-r3 |
|=========================+=====================================|
| Parameter OID | {..*.. rainbowV-r3} |
| | <.> |
| NIST Level Security | Level 5 |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Parameters | Field F = GF(256) |
| | u = 2 |
| | v1 = 96 |
| | o1 = 36 |
| | o2 = 64 |
| | n = v2 = 196 |
| | m = n - v1 = 100 |
|=========================+=====================================|
Figure 15
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
9.2. Key Details
Public key. The public-key consists of two parameters:
* P: a mapping from F^{n} to F^{m}
* ell: length of the used salt. Needs to be included to reach EUF-
CMA security.
This mapping can be expressed as m quadratic polynomials in the ring
F[x1, ... , xn], which means the public key consists of
m*(n+1)*(n+2)/2 elements of F. With optimizations (see Rainbow
specification), this can be reduced to m*n*(n+1)/2 elements of F.
The size necessary to hold all public key elements accounts to
m*n*(n+1)/16*f bytes, where f=4 for rainbowI and 8 for rainbowIII and
rainbowV. For all parameter sets ell is 16 bytes. Secret key. The
secret key consists of 4 parameters:
* S: affine map from F^{m} to F^{m}
* T: affine map from F^{n} to F^{n}
* F: quadratic central map of F^{n} to F^{n}
* ell: length of the used salt. Needs to be included to reach EUF-
CMA security.
The affine mappings S and T can respectively be expressed in terms of
m*(m+1) and n*(n+1) elements of F. The central map F mapping can be
expressed as m multivariate polynomials and be stored as
o1*(v1*(v1+1)/2 + v1*o1)+ o2*((v1+ o1)*(v1+o1+1)/2 +(v1+o1)*o2) field
elements (see section 4.1 of the Rainbow specification). Rainbow can
be instantiated in its CZ-Rainbow form. The key generation method is
then inverted. This allows parts of the public key to be fixed and
therefore reproduced from a partially stored public key.
Public key - CZ.
The public-key of CZ-Rainbow consists of 3 parameters:
* 256-bit seed spub
* P: a partially stored mapping from Fn to Fm
* ell: length of the used salt. Needs to be included to reach EUF-
CMA security
The partial public key now consists of 5 submatrices totaling
o1*o2*v1 + o1*o1*(o1+1)/2 +o1*o2*o1 + o1*o2*(o2+1)/2 + o2*o2*(o2+1)/2
elements of F. Additionally the seed spub is 32 bytes. The secret
key can also be stored as the seeds of the key generation process
spriv (32 bytes) and spub (32 bytes). This is denoted as the
compressed key and has a size of total 64 bytes. The resulting
public key and private key sizes can be found in the table below.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
|=========================+==========+=========|
| Algorithm | Public | Secret |
| | Key | Key |
| | Length | Length |
|=========================+==========+=========+
| rainbowI-r3 | 161616 | 103632 |
| rainbowI-r3 (CZ) | 60208 | 64 |
| rainbowIII-r3 | 882096 | 626032 |
| rainbowIII-r3 (CZ) | 264624 | 64 |
| rainbowV-r3 | 1930616 | 1408720 |
| rainbowV-r3 (CZ) | 536152 | 64 |
|=========================+==========+=========|
Figure 16
9.3. Secret Key Full Encoding
A Rainbow private key encoded according with PKCS#8 MUST include the
following two fields:
* rainbow-{eclvl}-r3 in the algorithm field of AlgorithmIdentifier
* RainbowPrivateKey in the privateKey field, which is an OCTET
STRING.
When a Rainbow public key is included in the distributed
PrivateKeyInfo, the PublicKey field in RainbowPrivateKey is used (see
description of RainbowPublicKey below). ASN.1 Encoding for a fully
populated rainbow private key:
RainbowPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
S OCTET STRING, -- map S
T OCTET STRING, -- map T
F OCTET STRING, -- map F
ell OCTET STRING,
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT RainbowPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
9.4. Secret Key Partial Encoding
A partially populated private key is used when Compressed Rainbow is
used. In this case, spriv and spub are used to regenerate the full
key. The ASN.1 encoding is then defined as follows:
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
RainbowPrivateKey ::= SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER {v0(0)} -- version (round 3)
s_priv OCTET STRING, -- seed for private key
s_pub OCTET STRING, -- seed for public key
ell OCTET STRING,
PublicKey [0] IMPLICIT RainbowPublicKey OPTIONAL
-- see next section
}
9.5. Public Key Full Encoding
Public keys can either be distributed stand-alone as
subjectPublicKeyInfo or optionally be included in PrivateKeyInfo
(::=OneAsymmetricKey) and distributed together with the corresponding
private key. Once the RainbowPublicKey below is encoded as OCTET
STRING (subjectPublicKey in subjectPublicKeyInfo) and once as BIT
STRING (publicKey in OneAsymmetricKey).
The public key for the standard Rainbow scheme consists of an EMPTY
spub field, and P consists of encoding of respectively GF(16) and
GF(256) field elements appended to form OCTET STRINGS. The CZ
variant of rainbow then includes a 32-byte seed spub, which reduces
the number of field elements encoded in P.
RainbowPublicKey ::= SEQUENCE {
s_pub OCTET STRING -- (EMPTY)
P OCTET STRING,
ell OCTET STRING
}
10. Acknowledgements
This template was derived from an initial version written by Pekka
Savola and contributed by him to the xml2rfc project.
This document is part of a plan to make xml2rfc indispensable.
11. IANA Considerations
This memo includes no request to IANA.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
12. Security Considerations
Any processing of the ASN.1 private key structures, such as base64
en/decoding shall be performed in "constant-time", meaning without
secret-dependent control flow and table lookups. The ASN.1
structures in this document are defined with fixed tag-lengths. The
purpose is to prevent side-channel leakage of variable lengths during
DER parsing. Any DER parsing of the private key ASN.1 key structures
shall be performed with these fixed lengths.
13. References
13.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5208] Kaliski, B., "Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #8:
Private-Key Information Syntax Specification Version 1.2",
BCP 14, RFC 5208, DOI 10.17487/RFC5208, May 2008,
<hhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5208>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL)
Profile", BCP 14, RFC RFC5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May
2008, <hhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcRFC5280>.
[RFC5480] Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public
Key Information", BCP 14, RFC RFC5480,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5480, May 2009,
<hhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5480>.
13.2. Informative References
[RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2629, June 1999,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2629>.
[RFC3552] Rescorla, E. and B. Korver, "Guidelines for Writing RFC
Text on Security Considerations", BCP 72, RFC 3552,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3552, July 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3552>.
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", RFC 5226,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.
Appendix A. Additional Stuff
This becomes an Appendix.
Authors' Addresses
Christine van Vredendaal (editor)
NXP Semiconductors
High Tech Campus 60
5656 AE Eindhoven
Netherlands
Phone: +44 7889 488 335
Email: cvvrede@gmail.com
Silvio Dragione (editor)
IBM Research GmbH
Saeumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rueschlikon
Switzerland
Email: sdi@zurich.ibm.com
Basil Hess (editor)
IBM Research GmbH
Saeumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rueschlikon
Switzerland
Email: bhe@zurich.ibm.com
Tamas Visgrady (editor)
IBM Research GmbH
Saeumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rueschlikon
Switzerland
Email: tvi@zurich.ibm.com
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft QSC Cryptography Key Information November 2021
Michael Osborne (editor)
IBM Research GmbH
Saeumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rueschlikon
Switzerland
Email: osb@zurich.ibm.com
Dieter Bong (editor)
Utimaco IS GmbH
Germanusstrasse 4
52080 Aachen
Germany
Email: dieter.bong@utimaco.com
Joppe Bos (editor)
NXP Semiconductors
High Tech Campus 60
5656 AE Eindhoven
Netherlands
Phone: +44 7889 488 335
Email: joppe.bos@nxp.com
Vredendaal, et al. Expires 13 May 2022 [Page 41]