%% You should probably cite draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-09 instead of this revision.
@techreport{usama-tls-fatt-extension-02,
    number =    {draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension/02/},
    author =    {Muhammad Usama Sardar},
    title =     {{Extensions to TLS FATT Process}},
    pagetotal = 14,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document applies only to non-trivial extensions of TLS, which require formal analysis. It proposes the authors provide a threat model and informal security goals in the Security Considerations section, as well as motivation and a protocol diagram in the draft. We also briefly present a few pain points of the team doing the formal analysis which -- we believe -- require refining the process: * Contacting FATT * Understanding the opposing goals * No response from some authors * Slots at meeting * Provide protection against FATT-bypass by other TLS-related WGs * Process not being followed},
}