%% You should probably cite draft-usama-tls-risks-of-mlkem-04 instead of this revision.
@techreport{usama-tls-risks-of-mlkem-03,
    number =    {draft-usama-tls-risks-of-mlkem-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-usama-tls-risks-of-mlkem/03/},
    author =    {Muhammad Usama Sardar},
    title =     {{Analysis of Hybrid Key Exchange and Standalone ML-KEM in TLS 1.3}},
    pagetotal = 20,
    year =      2026,
    month =     jun,
    day =       11,
    abstract =  {The draft presents \_symbolic\_ and \_computational\_ analysis of hybrid key exchange and standalone ML-KEM. In our observation, we believe that hybrid key exchange is preferable over standalone ML-KEM until a powerful CRQC exists which breaks *all* the bits of pre-quantum. This draft also offers opinions of the IETF participants and some preliminary discussion to help the developers and policymakers make informed choices. Finally, it offers minimal implementation guidance for hybrids.},
}