@techreport{vaananen-mpls-tm-framework-00,
    number =    {draft-vaananen-mpls-tm-framework-00},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vaananen-mpls-tm-framework/00/},
    author =    {Dr. Ravadurgam Ravikanth and Pasi J. Vaananen},
    title =     {{Framework for Traffic Management in MPLS Networks}},
    pagetotal = 55,
    year =      1998,
    month =     mar,
    day =       19,
    abstract =  {It has been recognised that the success of the MPLS depends on the ability to better support the multiservice traffic integration with some levels of service guarantees, which are not feasible to implement with the current destination prefix only based packet forwarding paradigms. The efficient support for these services throughout the network is expected to be possible using label based forwarding paradigm in the network. However, the service categories and the enabling mechanisms to support those service categories are not well addressed in the current proposals for the MPLS working group; the effort has mostly concentrated on the handling of the best effort traffic and associated scalability and routing related issues. The goal of this document is to define a framework for traffic management in MPLS networks. We discuss the set of mechanisms that have been proposed for enabling the implementation of the more advanced services than pure best-effort packet forwarding, and the impact of those mechanisms with respect to MPLS network environments and MPLS protocol implementation. The document describes the mechanisms and their application with the intent to approach the level of the traffic management capabilities that are currently available in hybrid router/ATM or frame relay networks using the MPLS. The approach taken is that no modifications are required in the end station protocol or application software in the first phase of deployment, while this might be allowed later, if deemed necessary. This document concentrates on the issues from the public network operators point of view, although most of the discussion applies as well in the local network environments. Concepts and mechanisms described in this document are based on the previous work done in the subject on various working groups of IETF and other standardisation bodies. It has been attempted to use applicable concepts and terminology from previous work as},
}