IPv6 Oversized Packets Analysis
draft-vasilenko-v6ops-ipv6-oversized-analysis-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Eduard V , XiPeng Xiao , Dmitriy Khaustov | ||
| Last updated | 2022-03-22 (Latest revision 2021-09-18) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The IETF has some initiatives relying on IPv6 Extension Headers added in transit: SRv6, iOAM. Additionally, some recent developments are overlays (SRv6, VxLAN, NVO3, L2TPv3, and LISP). It could create oversized packets that need to be dealt with. This document analyzes available standards for the resolution of oversized packet drops.
Authors
Eduard V
XiPeng Xiao
Dmitriy Khaustov
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)