%% You should probably cite draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-10 instead of this revision. @techreport{voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-00, number = {draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion/00/}, author = {Daniel Voyer and Daniel Bernier and John Leddy and Clarence Filsfils and Stefano Previdi and Stefano Salsano and Antonio Cianfrani and David Lebrun and Olivier Bonaventure and Prem Jonnalagadda and Milad Sharif and Hani Elmalky and Ahmed Abdelsalam and Robert Raszuk and Arthi Ayyangar and Dirk Steinberg and Wim Henderickx}, title = {{Insertion of IPv6 Segment Routing Headers in a Controlled Domain}}, pagetotal = 11, year = 2017, month = mar, day = 28, abstract = {The network operator and vendor community has clearly indicated that IPv6 header insertion is useful and required. This is notably the case when the entire journey of the packet remains in its source domain. In such a context, it does not matter where the extension header is inserted. The source domain may decide to place the IPv6 extension header insertion where it suits its best: at the source of the packet or at any midpoint within the source domain.}, }