Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Method Requirements for Wireless LANs
draft-walker-ieee802-req-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bert Wijnen |
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Margaret Wasserman |
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin |
2004-08-27
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-08-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-08-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-08-26
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-08-26
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-08-18
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin |
2004-08-10
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-walker-ieee802-req-04.txt |
2004-08-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Bert Wijnen |
2004-08-09
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-walker-ieee802-req-03.txt |
2004-08-08
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Sent request to Bert and Allison to clear discuss comments. |
2004-08-08
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Sent request to Bert and Allison to clear discuss comments. |
2004-08-08
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-07-12
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2004-07-12
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-walker-ieee802-req-02.txt |
2004-06-30
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-11
|
04 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot discuss] Tracking the following discuss for Bert while he is on vacation: [2004-06-10] The document mentions:  Open issues:   http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that … [Ballot discuss] Tracking the following discuss for Bert while he is on vacation: [2004-06-10] The document mentions:  Open issues:   http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that web page lists issue 243 as "Pending for resolution". So what is the status? Based on OPS Directorate review (by Pekka): There is a citation to [RFC3579] in Security COnsiderations Section which seems to be normative to me. So I'd say that the reference must be moved to the normative references section. Can be done by RFC Editor note. Comment: [2004-06-10] There is a normative ref to this "work in progress"  [IEEE802.11i]      Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "Unapproved      Draft Supplement to Standard for Telecommunications and      Information Exchange Between Systems - LAN/MAN Specific      Requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control      (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Specification      for Enhanced Security", IEEE Draft 802.11i (work in progress),      2003. We may want/need to check that this will not deadlock the requested for publication by IEEE. |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Margaret Wasserman has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot discuss] The document mentions: Open issues: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that web page lists issue 243 as "Pending for resolution". So what is … [Ballot discuss] The document mentions: Open issues: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that web page lists issue 243 as "Pending for resolution". So what is the status? Based on OPS Directorate review (by Pekka): There is a citation to [RFC3579] in Security COnsiderations Section which seems to be normative to me. So I'd say that the reference must be moved to the normative references section. Can be done by RFC Editor note. |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] There is a normative ref to this "work in progress" [IEEE802.11i] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, … [Ballot comment] There is a normative ref to this "work in progress" [IEEE802.11i] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "Unapproved Draft Supplement to Standard for Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Specification for Enhanced Security", IEEE Draft 802.11i (work in progress), 2003. We may want/need to check that this will not deadlock the requested for publication by IEEE. |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot discuss] Blue Team reviewer Discuss, entered in the tracker: I think this is a very reasonable document, but I see one glitch, a gap … [Ballot discuss] Blue Team reviewer Discuss, entered in the tracker: I think this is a very reasonable document, but I see one glitch, a gap between the mandatory requirements and the Security Considerations. In the mandatory requirements (2.2[3]), the requirement is only for mutual authentication support, but the Security Considerations state that authorization as well as mutual authentication is required: EAP peer and authenticator authorization must be performed. Issues relating to authorization are discussed in [RFC3748] Section 7.15, and [RFC3579] Section 4.3.7. I haven't heard any discussions of authorization by 802.11i, so I have no knowledge of whether authorization is feasible, out-of-scope, etc. But the section sticks out, and it makes relationship of the Security Considerations to the rest of the document unclear. Does the Security Considerations section provide further requirements for IEEE 802.11i? If it doesn't, then there needs to be a sentence noting that the section is there to provide advisory information. I don't know if it's possible to give an RFC Editor Note to a document that comes to the IETF approved by IEEE, but my suggestion is a sentence introducing the Security Considerations clarifying its role. I'll change this Discuss to a comment if the AD and Russ (as the author whose Security Considerations are quoted) believe that there is no benefit to the community in making a change to the document. |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Allison Mankin |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot discuss] The document mentions: Open issues: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that web page lists issue 243 as "Pending for resolution". So what is … [Ballot discuss] The document mentions: Open issues: http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html and that web page lists issue 243 as "Pending for resolution". So what is the status? |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Bert Wijnen |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2004-06-10
|
04 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2004-06-08
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-06-08
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-06-04
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Note]: 'To be reviewed by the IESG BLUE TEAM!' added by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-02
|
04 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Note field has been cleared by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Ballot has been issued by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-06-01
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-05-22
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-05-13
|
04 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2004-05-13
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-walker-ieee802-req-01.txt |
2004-05-10
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for Writeup by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-05-10
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Note]: 'Last called to solicit feedback before IEEE meeting in mid-March. Draft is missing some sections and requires update before publication.' added by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-03-28
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from Revised ID Needed by system |
2004-03-28
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Note]: 'Last called to solicit feedback before IEEE meeting in mid-March. Draft is missing some sections and requires update before publication.' added by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-03-28
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to In Last Call::Revised ID Needed from In Last Call by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-02-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2004-02-29
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2004-02-24
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Last Call was requested by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-02-24
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-02-24
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-02-24
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-02-24
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-02-24
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | Draft Added by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-02-04
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-walker-ieee802-req-00.txt |