HIP Service Overlay Study
draft-wang-hiprg-service-overlay-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Jun Wang , Jiong Shen | ||
| Last updated | 2010-08-31 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft is a HIP service overlay study document, it presents several disadvantages of current HIP protocol and then takes a brief introduction of two existing alternative solutions. Finally, the authors propose a HIP service overlay architecture.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)