Some Heuristics about Piggybacked Binding Updates
draft-westphal-mobileip-piggyback-bu-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Cedric Westphal , Charles E. Perkins | ||
| Last updated | 2002-02-19 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document presents some simple analytical results with respect to the performance improvement brought by piggybacking binding updates (BUs). We see that the improvement in term of bandwidth is not significant unless the mobile terminal sending BUs moves very fast. We also see on the other hand that the improvement in term of jitter is quite significant in most situations.
Authors
Cedric Westphal
Charles E. Perkins
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)