%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-idr-linklocal-capability instead of this I-D.
@techreport{white-linklocal-capability-06,
    number =    {draft-white-linklocal-capability-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-linklocal-capability/06/},
    author =    {Russ White and Jeff Tantsura and Donatas Abraitis},
    title =     {{Link-Local Next Hop Capability for BGP}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2025,
    month =     mar,
    day =       2,
    abstract =  {BGP {[}RFC4271{]}, was originally designed to provide reachability between domains and between the edges of a domain. As such, BGP assumes the next hop towards any reachable destination may not reside on the advertising speaker, but rather may either be through a router connected to the same subnet as the speaker, or through a router only reachable by traversing multiple hops through the network. Because of this, as per {[}RFC4291{]} - BGP does not recognize IPv6 link-local addresses, as a valid next hop for the forwarding purposes. This draft standardizes the operation of BGP over a point-to-point link using link-local IPv6 addressing only.},
}