%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-tsvwg-l4sops instead of this I-D.
@techreport{white-tsvwg-l4sops-02,
    number =    {draft-white-tsvwg-l4sops-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-tsvwg-l4sops/02/},
    author =    {Greg White},
    title =     {{Operational Guidance for Deployment of L4S in the Internet}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2021,
    month =     feb,
    day =       22,
    abstract =  {This document is intended to provide additional guidance to operators of end-systems, operators of networks, and researchers beyond that provided in {[}I-D.ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id{]} and {[}I-D.ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled{]} in order to ensure successful deployment of L4S {[}I-D.ietf-tsvwg-l4s-arch{]} in the Internet. The focus of this document is on potential interactions between L4S flows and Classic ECN ({[}RFC3168{]}) flows in Classic ECN bottleneck links. The document discusses the potential outcomes of these interactions, describes mechanisms to detect the presence of {[}RFC3168{]} bottlenecks, and identifies opportunites to prevent and/or detect and resolve fairness problems in such networks.},
}