DRIP Identity Claims
draft-wiethuechter-drip-identity-claims-00

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2020-03-23
Replaces draft-wiethuechter-tmrid-identity-claims
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text html xml pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
DRIP                                                     A. Wiethuechter
Internet-Draft                                                   S. Card
Intended status: Standards Track                           AX Enterprize
Expires: 24 September 2020                                  R. Moskowitz
                                                          HTT Consulting
                                                           23 March 2020

                          DRIP Identity Claims
               draft-wiethuechter-drip-identity-claims-00

Abstract

   This document describes 7 Identity Claims for use in various Drone
   Remote ID Protocols (DRIP).

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 September 2020.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
   as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Wiethuechter, et al.    Expires 24 September 2020               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               Identity Claims                  March 2020

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.1.  Requirements Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     2.2.  Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Host Identity Claims  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  Why the term: Host Identity Claims  . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  Cxx Form  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
       3.2.1.  Cxx Claims  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.3.  Cxy Form  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       3.3.1.  Cxy Claims  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.4.  Claim Registry on Aircraft  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   4.  Provisioning  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     4.1.  HHIT Delegation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     4.2.  Operator  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     4.3.  Aircraft  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     4.4.  Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   7.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12

1.  Introduction

   This document expands on Hierarchical HIT Registries
   [hhit-registries], defining defining 7 Identity Claims that are
   created and distributed through the provisioning process of a
   Unmanned Aircraft in Trustworthy Multipupose Remote ID (TMRID).

   These claims establish trust for Hierarchical HITs
   [hierarchical-hit].  They are then used in various Drone Remote ID
   Protocols to establish the trustworthy claims needed to safely use
   the data provided.

2.  Terms and Definitions

2.1.  Requirements Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

Wiethuechter, et al.    Expires 24 September 2020               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft               Identity Claims                  March 2020

2.2.  Definitions

   HDA (Hierarchical HIT Domain Authority):  The 14 bit field
Show full document text