A Comparison of Proposals to Replace NAT-PT
draft-wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dan Wing , David Ward , Alain Durand | ||
| Last updated | 2008-09-29 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
As we approach IPv4 address depletion, the IETF must provide for IPv4 and IPv6 coexistence: a way for ISPs and enterprises to reduce public IPv4 address consumption and a way for hosts to migrate to IPv6 connectivity -- while providing reasonable access for those IPv6 hosts to access the IPv4 Internet. This draft compares eight proposals for IPv6 and IPv4 coexistence.
Authors
Dan Wing
David Ward
Alain Durand
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)