Specifying Civic Address Extensions in PIDF-LO
draft-winterbottom-geopriv-local-civic-04

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2010-12-16
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-local-civic-04.txt

Abstract

New fields are occasionally added to civic addresses. A backwardly- compatible mechanism for adding civic address elements to the Geopriv civic address format is described. A formal mechanism for handling unsupported extensions when translating between XML and DHCP civic address forms is defined for entities that need to perform this translation.

Authors

James Winterbottom (james.winterbottom@andrew.com)
Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@andrew.com)
Richard Barnes (rbarnes@bbn.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)