Happy EarBalls: Success with Dual-Stack, Connection-Oriented SIP
draft-worley-sip-he-connection-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Olle E. Johansson , Gonzalo Salgueiro , Dale R. Worley | ||
| Last updated | 2017-06-15 (Latest revision 2016-12-12) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) supports multiple transports running both over IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. In more and more cases, a SIP user agent (UA) is connected to multiple network interfaces. In these cases setting up a connection from a dual stack client to a dual stack server may suffer from the issues described in RFC 6555 [RFC6555] ("Happy Eyeballs") - significant delays in the process of setting up a working flow to a server. This negatively affects user experience. This document builds on RFC 6555 and explains how a [RFC3261] compliant SIP implementation can minimize delays when contacting a host name (obtained by using DNS NAPTR and SRV lookups) in a dual stack network using connection-oriented transport protocols.
Authors
Olle E. Johansson
Gonzalo Salgueiro
Dale R. Worley
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)