%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags instead of this I-D. @techreport{xiong-pce-lsp-flag-02, number = {draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag/02/}, author = {Quan Xiong}, title = {{LSP Object Flag Extension of Stateful PCE}}, pagetotal = 6, year = 2020, month = may, day = 1, abstract = {RFC8231 describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS Label Switched Paths(LSPs) via PCEP. One of the extensions is the LSP object which includes a Flag field and the length is 12 bits. However, 11 bits of the Flag field has been assigned in RFC8231, RFC8281 and RFC8623 respectively. This document proposes to define a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV for LSP object to extend the length of the flags.}, }