PCEP extensions for SR-TP
draft-xiong-pce-pcep-extension-sr-tp-01

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-08-27 (latest revision 2018-03-05)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
PCE WG                                                        Quan Xiong
Internet-Draft                                                Fangwei Hu
Intended status: Standards Track                         Shuangping Zhan
Expires: February 28, 2019                               ZTE Corporation
                                                         August 27, 2018

                       PCEP extensions for SR-TP
                draft-xiong-pce-pcep-extension-sr-tp-01

Abstract

   This document proposes a set of extensions to PCEP for Segment
   Routing in MPLS Transport Profile (SR-TP) networks and defines a
   mechanism to create the bi-directional SR tunnel in SR-TP networks
   with PCE.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 28, 2019.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Quan Xiong, et al.      Expires February 28, 2019               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft          PCEP extensions for SR-TP            August 2018

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  The SR-TP Architecture with PCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  SR Path SID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Overview of Bi-directional SR tunnel  . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.1.  Associated Bidirectional SR tunnel  . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  PCEP extensions for SR-TP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.1.  SR-TP ERO extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.2.  Processing Rules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     8.1.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     8.2.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8

1.  Introduction

   The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) defined in
   [RFC5440] provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to
   perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients
   (PCCs) requests.

   [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] proposes extensions to PCEP that allow
   a stateful PCE to compute Traffic Engineering (TE) paths in segment
   routing (SR) networks.  But it is applicable to Multi-protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) networks.  [I-D.hu-spring-sr-tp-use-case] describes
   the use case of SR tunnel to be deployed in MPLS Transport Profile
   (SR-TP) network.  It is required to extend the PCEP protocol to meet
   the new requirements for SR-TP.  One of the requirements is the
   bidirectional SR tunnel described in
   [I-D.cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment].

   This document proposes a set of extensions to PCEP for Segment
   Routing in MPLS Transport Profile (SR-TP) networks and defines a
   mechanism to create the bidirectional SR tunnel in SR-TP networks
   with PCE.

1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

Quan Xiong, et al.      Expires February 28, 2019               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft          PCEP extensions for SR-TP            August 2018

1.2.  Terminology

   The terminology is defined as [RFC5440],
Show full document text