Gap and Solution Space Analysis for End to End Privacy Enabled Mapping System
draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Dirk Von Hugo , Behcet Sarikaya , Tom Herbert , Luigi Iannone | ||
| Last updated | 2018-12-09 (Latest revision 2018-06-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document presents a gap and solution analysis for end-to-end privacy enabled mapping systems. Each of the identifier locator separation system has its own approach to mapping identifiers to the locators. We analyse all these approaches and identify the gaps in each of them and do a solution space analysis in an attempt to identify a mapping system that can be end to end privacy enabled.
Authors
Dirk Von Hugo
Behcet Sarikaya
Tom Herbert
Luigi Iannone
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)