Mobility Management and Capability Negotiation
draft-yan-anima-mmcn-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zhiwei Yan , Tianji Jiang , Jianfeng Guan , Tao Huang , Jong-Hyouk Lee | ||
| Last updated | 2025-09-02 (Latest revision 2025-03-01) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Based on different requirements, multiple mobility management protocols have been developed. Different protocols have different functional requirements on the network element or the host and then a scheme should be used in order to support the negotiation and selection of adopted mobility management protocol when a host accesses to a new network. In this draft, this issue is analyzed.
Authors
Zhiwei Yan
Tianji Jiang
Jianfeng Guan
Tao Huang
Jong-Hyouk Lee
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)