Mobility Capability Negotiation and Protocol Selection
draft-yan-dmm-man-04
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2019-04-18 (latest revision 2018-10-15) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-yan-dmm-man-04.txt
Abstract
Based on different requirements, multiple mobility management protocols have been developed. Different protocols have different functional requirements on the network element or the host and then a scheme should be used in order to support the negotiation and selection of adopted mobility management protocol when a host accesses to a new network. In this draft, this issue is analyzed.
Authors
Zhiwei Yan
(yan@cnnic.cn)
Guanggang Geng
(ggg@cnnic.cn)
Jong-Hyouk Lee
(jonghyouk@smu.ac.kr)
Anthony Chan
(h.a.chan@ieee.org)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)