Mobility Capability Negotiation and Protocol Selection
draft-yan-dmm-man-05
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Zhiwei Yan , Guanggang Geng , Jong-Hyouk Lee , Anthony Chan | ||
Last updated | 2020-03-22 (Latest revision 2019-09-19) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Based on different requirements, multiple mobility management protocols have been developed. Different protocols have different functional requirements on the network element or the host and then a scheme should be used in order to support the negotiation and selection of adopted mobility management protocol when a host accesses to a new network. In this draft, this issue is analyzed.
Authors
Zhiwei Yan
Guanggang Geng
Jong-Hyouk Lee
Anthony Chan
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)