Mobility Capability Negotiation as a 5G Mobility Pattern
draft-yan-dmm-man-09
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zhiwei Yan , Jianfeng Guan , Jong-Hyouk Lee , Tao Huang | ||
| Last updated | 2022-07-31 (Latest revision 2022-01-27) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Mobility support is an important network capability for mobile node, and 5G introduces the Mobility Pattern used by the Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) to optimize mobility support provided to the UE. More specific, The AMF determines and updates Mobility Pattern of the UE according to the subscription of the UE, statistics of the UE mobility, network local policy, and the UE assisted information, or any combination of them with the help of NWDAF. Based on different requirements, multiple mobility management protocols have been developed under IPv6. However, different protocols have different functional requirements on the network element or the host and then a scheme should be used in order to support the negotiation and selection of adopted mobility management protocol when a host (or UE) accesses to a new network. In this draft, this issue is analyzed.
Authors
Zhiwei Yan
Jianfeng Guan
Jong-Hyouk Lee
Tao Huang
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)