Skip to main content

BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export
draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-egress-00

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
Authors Randy Bush , Rüdiger Volk , Jakob Heitz
Last updated 2019-01-03
Replaced by draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress, RFC 8893
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-egress-00
Network Working Group                                            R. Bush
Internet-Draft                                 Internet Initiative Japan
Intended status: Standards Track                                 R. Volk
Expires: July 7, 2019                                   Deutsche Telekom
                                                                J. Heitz
                                                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
                                                         January 3, 2019

               BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export
                    draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-egress-00

Abstract

   It is useful fpr RPKI-based Origin Validation to classify and mark
   prefixes for all ingress, redistribution, and egress policies.  For
   egress policy, it is important that the classification uses the
   effective origin AS of the processed route, which may specifically be
   altered by the commonly available knobs such as removing private ASs,
   confederation handling, and other modifications of the origin AS.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to
   be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] only when they appear in all
   upper case.  They may also appear in lower or mixed case as English
   words, without normative meaning.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on July 7, 2019.

Bush, et al.              Expires July 7, 2019                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export   January 2019

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

1.  Introduction

   As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, policy semantics
   based on RPKI Origin Validation state MUST be able to be applied
   separately on distribution into BGP and on egress.

   When applied to egress policy, the effective origin AS MUST be used
   to determine the Origin Validation state.  The effective origin AS is
   that which will actually be the origin AS in the announcement.  It
   might be affected by removal of private AS(s), confederation, AS
   migration, etc.  If there are any AS_PATH modifications resulting in
   origin AS change, then these MUST be taken into account.

2.  Suggested Reading

   It is assumed that the reader understands BGP, [RFC4271], the RPKI,
   [RFC6480], Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs), [RFC6482], RPKI-based
   Prefix Validation, [RFC6811], and Origin Validation Clarifications,
   [RFC8481].

3.  Egress Processing

   BGP implementations supporting RPKI-based origin validation SHOULD
   provide the same policy configuration primitives for decisions based
   on validation state available for use in ingress, redistribution, and
   egress policies.  When applied to egress policy, validation state
   MUST be determined using the effective origin AS of the route as it
   will (or would) be announced to the peer.  The effective origin AS
   may differ from that of the route in the RIB due to commonly
   available knobs such as: removal of private ASs, AS path
   manipulation, confederation handling, etc.

Bush, et al.              Expires July 7, 2019                  [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export   January 2019

   Egress policy handling can provide more robust protection for
   outbound eBGP than relying solely on ingress (iBGP, eBGP, connected,
   static, etc.) redistribution being configured and working correctly -
   better support for the robustness principle.

4.  Security Considerations

   This document does not create security considerations beyond those of
   [RFC6811] and [RFC8481].

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no IANA Considerations.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC6482]  Lepinski, M., Kent, S., and D. Kong, "A Profile for Route
              Origin Authorizations (ROAs)", RFC 6482,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6482, February 2012,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6482>.

   [RFC6811]  Mohapatra, P., Scudder, J., Ward, D., Bush, R., and R.
              Austein, "BGP Prefix Origin Validation", RFC 6811,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6811, January 2013,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6811>.

   [RFC8481]  Bush, R., "Clarifications to BGP Origin Validation Based
              on Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)", RFC 8481,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8481, September 2018,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8481>.

6.2.  Informative References

   [RFC4271]  Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
              Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.

   [RFC6480]  Lepinski, M. and S. Kent, "An Infrastructure to Support
              Secure Internet Routing", RFC 6480, DOI 10.17487/RFC6480,
              February 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6480>.

Bush, et al.              Expires July 7, 2019                  [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export   January 2019

Authors' Addresses

   Randy Bush
   Internet Initiative Japan
   5147 Crystal Springs
   Bainbridge Island, Washington  98110
   US

   Email: randy@psg.com

   Ruediger Volk
   Deutsche Telekom

   Jakob Heitz
   Cisco Systems, Inc.

Bush, et al.              Expires July 7, 2019                  [Page 4]