A YANG Data Model for Optical Resource Performance Monitoring
draft-yu-ccamp-optical-resource-pm-yang-00
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Chaode Yu , Fabio Peruzzini , Zheng Yanlei , Italo Busi , Aihua Guo | ||
| Last updated | 2023-03-12 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-yu-ccamp-optical-resource-pm-yang-00
CCAMP Working Group C. Yu
Internet-Draft Huawei Technologies
Intended status: Standards Track F. Peruzzini
Expires: 14 September 2023 TIM
Y. Zheng
China Unicom
I. Busi
Huawei Technologies
A. Guo
Futurewei Technologies
13 March 2023
A YANG Data Model for Optical Resource Performance Monitoring
draft-yu-ccamp-optical-resource-pm-yang-00
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for performance Monitoring in
optical networks which provides the functionalities of performance
monitoring task management, TCA (Threshold Crossing Alert)
configuration and current or historic performance data retrieval.
This data model should be used in the northbound of PNC.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 September 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Terminology and Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Prefix in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. YANG Data Model for Optical Performance Monitoring . . . . . 5
2.1. Performance Management Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. PerformanceManagementRetrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3. Threshold Crossing Alert Control . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.4. Generic Resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. Performance Indicator Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Optical Performance Monitoring Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . 11
5. YANG Model for Optical Performance Monitoring . . . . . . . . 13
6. YANG Model for Optical Performance Monitoring Types . . . . . 26
7. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1. Introduction
Performance monitoring is a basic function of optical networks
management. With it, operators can proactively detect the running
state of devices, identify major risks in advanced and avoid users'
complaints.
As before, TMF has defined interfaces for performance management
through traditional protocols, such as CORBA and MTOSI. With the
development of SDN technologies and the using of RESTCONF interfaces,
it becomes a widespread requirement to use RESTCONF protocol to
support performance monitoring.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
Using RESTCONF does not mean changing existing performance monitoring
requirements or scenarios. On the contrary, since O&M is very
important, many operators' O&M departments tend to be conservative.
Mostly, they are fear of introducing issues into their network due to
the protocol changes and O&M habits changes. Therefore, our document
prefers to use the new protocol to support legacy functionality.
Traditional performance management involves control of performance
monitoring, setting collectors on monitored objects, and obtaining
performance data in different periods. The data can be current data
on devices or processed by PNC, and historical performance data. TCA
can be also configured by performance monitoring tasks.
The explanation of performance monitoring indicator would also be an
important part of this document, especially some typical optical-
specific indicators.
Currently, there are some existing documents related to performance
monitoring in IETF, but there is no overlap with our current work.
For example:
[I-D.ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics] provides a YANG data
model that describes performance monitoring and scaling intent
mechanisms for TE-Tunnels and Virtual Networks(VNs). VN is
determinated to be used in CMI (CNC-MDSC Interface) level and TE
tunnel is more service or connection related. Our data model is
proposed to be used in MPI (MDSC-PNC Interface) level and this
performance monitoring is performed on network resources, such as
network element, board, fiber, port or TTP (Tunnel Termination
Point), which are not included in
[I-D.ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics].
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm] defines a YANG data model for
performance monitoring of both network topology layer and overlay VPN
service topology layer. VPN service is more IP-specific and not
adopted in Optical domain. And the data model in this document is
augmenting network model. If the client wants to retrieve
performance data of a link by RESTCONF, the URL would be probably
same with the URL of topology retrieval. This may need some special
mechanisms to make the client and server differentiate the using
scenarios. This is not quite compliance with current O&M habits of
Optical technology.
[I-D.zheng-ccamp-client-pm-yang] provides a performance monitoring
YANG data model on client signal level. It is also not operated on
resource level which is not compliance with the existing O&M habits.
This performance monitoring solution is more user-oriented and can be
used for more automatic O&M scenarios in the future. However, there
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
is not a complete closed-loop O&M solution at the service layer and
it has not been accepted by all operators' O&M departments, resource-
based performance monitoring is still required.
The YANG data model defined in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342].
1.1. Terminology and Notations
Refer to [RFC7446] and [RFC7581] for the key terms used in this
document. The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are not
redefined here: * client * server * augment * data model * data node
The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are not redefined
here: * configuration data * state data
The following terms are defined in [RFC8454] and are not redefined
here: * CMI * MPI * MDSC * CNC * PNC
//To Be Added: some explanation of performance indicator
1.2. Tree Diagram
A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in
Section 3 of this document. The meaning of the symbols in these
diagrams are defined in [RFC8340].
1.3. Prefix in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects
are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in the following table.
+==============+================================+===========+
| Prefix | Yang Module | Reference |
+==============+================================+===========+
| optrpm | ietf-optical-resource-pm | RFC XXXX |
+--------------+--------------------------------+-----------+
| optrpm-types | ietf-optical-resource-pm-types | RFC XXXX |
+--------------+--------------------------------+-----------+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
+--------------+--------------------------------+-----------+
Table 1: Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules
RFC Editor Note: Please replace XXXX with the RFC number assigned to
this document.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
2. YANG Data Model for Optical Performance Monitoring
According to the business requirements stated in [TMF-518], resource
performance management requirements include: * The Interface shall
support the control of performance monitoring in the network. This
includes PM control, e.g., the enabling and disabling of PM
collection and Threshold Crossing Alerts (TCA) control, e.g., the
enabling and disabling of TCA generation. * The Interface shall
support the retrieval of current and historical performance
measurements for network resources. * The Interface shall support the
distribution of TCAs to subscribed OSs.
For these requirements of PM, there are three group of interfaces are
defined in TMF, including PerformanceManagementControl,
PerformanceManagementRetrieval and ThresholdCrossingAlertControlm.
2.1. Performance Management Control
There are three interfaces defined in TMF for this group, including:
* clearPerformanceMonitoringData: This interface shall allow MDSC to
clear or reset the performance register on TPs or NEs. This clearing
operation means to reset the data value to the current value. The
monitoring job is still running on. *
disablePerformanceMonitoringData: This interface shall allow MDSC
disable PM data collection on a list of TPs or NEs. *
enablePerformanceMonitoringData: This interface shall allow MDSC
enable PM data collection on a list of TPs or NEs.
This aspect of interface we introduce a monitor task to do this
control. In the monitoring task, MDSC should be able to configure
what period and what kind of performance data it want to collect.
The disabling, enabling operation can be satisfy by changing the
admin status which includes disabled, enabled. The change's result
will affect the task status accordingly.
//NOTES: To be added. to support the clearPerformanceMonitoringData
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--rw resource-id? leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--rw task-name? string
| +--rw admin-status? enumeration
| +--ro task-status? enumeration
| +--rw task-cfg
| +--rw period? identityref
| +--rw indicators
| +--rw indicator* [indicator-name]
| +--rw indicator-name string
| +--rw indicator-value-unit? string
2.2. PerformanceManagementRetrieval
There are six interfaces are defined in TMF for this group,
including: * getAllCurrentPerformanceMonitoringData: This interface
should allow MDSC to retrieve performance data on a series of
termination point. * getHistoryPerformanceMonitoringData: This
interface should allow MDSC to retrieve some historic performance
data on a series of termination point in a time period through FTP. *
getAllPerformanceMonitoringPoints: This interface should allow MDSC
to retrieve all the performance monitoring points in a specified
termination point or NE. * getHoldingTime: This interface should
allow MDSC to retrieve how many hours PM data records are held in
PNC. * getMePerformanceMonitoringCapabilities: This interface should
allow MDSC to retrieve what parameters are supported by a specified
NE or termination point.
For the retrieval of current/historic performance data, there is one
option that we define the value in the data model. But considered
that performance data is frequently changed and if we follow that
approach, according to the requirement of on-change notification in
YANG-push [RFC8641], once the performance data changes, the PNC
should trigger a notifcation to the MDSC, for the sake of data
consistency. But these two retrieval interfaces is more like on-
demand invoking. The interaction through notification would bring
great pressure to both PNC and MDSC.
And it is also hard to support retrieving performance data of
multiple resources by data model. And for historic performance data
retrieval, there could be a requirement to specify the start time and
end time. It is not quite flexible to support this requirement by
data model neither.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
So we suggest to define two RPCs to accomplish these two interfaces'
function.
rpcs:
+---x get-all-current-pm-data
| +--ro input
| | +--ro resources* leafref
| +--ro output
| +--ro pm-data
| +--ro pm-data-list* [resource]
| +--ro resource leafref
| +--ro collect-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--ro indicator-data
| +--ro indicator-data-list* [indicator-name]
| +--ro indicator-name string
| +--ro indicator-value? string
| +--ro indicator-value-unit? string
+---x get-historic-pm-data
+--ro input
| +--ro resources* leafref
| +--ro start-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro end-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro output
+--ro pm-data
+--ro pm-data-list* [resource]
+--ro resource leafref
+--ro collect-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro resource-type? identityref
+--ro indicator-data
+--ro indicator-data-list* [indicator-name]
+--ro indicator-name string
+--ro indicator-value? string
+--ro indicator-value-unit? string
//NOTE: To be futhur analyze: getAllPerformanceMonitoringPoints,
getHoldingTime, getMePerformanceMonitoringCapabilities
2.3. Threshold Crossing Alert Control
There are nine interfaces are defined in TMF for this group,
including: * createTcaParameterProfile: This interface should allow
MDSC to create a new TCA parameter profile. This profile can be
applied to the resources. * deleteTcaParameterProfile: This interface
should allow MDSC to delete an existing TCA parameter profile which
should not have been used by any resources. *
enableThresholdCrossingAlert: This interface should allow MDSC to
turn on TCA reporting on a list of TPs and NEs if the reporting was
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
turned off before. * disableThresholdCrossingAlert: This interface
should allow MDSC to turn off TCA reporting on a list of TPs and NEs.
* getAllTcaParameterProfiles: This interfaces should allow MDSC to
retrieve all TCA parameter profile that are being managed by a
specified NE. * getTcaParameterProfile: This interface should allow
MDSC to retrieve all the parameters of a specified TCA parameter
profile. * getTcaTpParameter: This interface should allow MDSC to
retrieve the PM threshold values on a TP. * setTcaParameterProfile:
This interface should allow MDSC to configure all threshold values of
a TCA parameter profile. * setTcaTpParameter: This interface should
allow MDSC to modify the values of TCA Parameters on a TP
To be summarized, there are four main requirements for Threshold
Crossing Alert Control: * Creation/retrieval/deletion/updating of TCA
profile; * Enabling/disabling TCA reporting on the resource; *
Configuring TCA on the resource by associating an existing profile; *
Configuring TCA on the resource by detailed parameters.
And for the TCA parameters, no matter it is configured directly on
the resource or by a preset profile, there should not be any
differences. The TCA parameter (indicator) should include: *
indicator-name: Name of indicator. This indicator should also
include some data processing information, such if it is a maximum, or
minimum, or average data .etc. * threshold-type: This threshold type
is used to indicate when the alert will be triggered. By exceeding
the upper bound value, or by below the lower bound value. * period:
This period is used to indicate the frequency of the data collection.
* severity: This severity is used to indicate what level of alert
would be triggered if cross the threshold. * indicator-value: The
value of threshold. * indicator-value-unit: The unit of threshold
value.
The tree structure for TCA profile:
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--......................
+--rw tca-management
| +--rw profiles
| | +--rw profile* [profile-id]
| | +--rw profile-id yang:uuid
| | +--rw profile-name? string
| | +--rw tca-cfg
| | +--rw tca-indicator* [indicator-name threshold-type period severity]
| | +--rw indicator-name string
| | +--rw indicator-value string
| | +--rw indicator-value-unit string
| | +--rw threshold-type enumeration
| | +--rw period identityref
| | +--rw severity identityref
The function of enabling/disabling TCA on the resource can be
controlled by an admin-status attributes in "tca" node:
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--......................
+--rw tca-management
| +--rw tca* [resource-id]
| +--rw resource-id leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--rw admin-status? enumeration
| +--......................
If MDSC wants to configure TCA by an existing profile, it can use
this applied-profiles structure:
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--......................
+--rw tca-management
| +--rw tca* [resource-id]
| +--rw resource-id leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--rw applied-profiles
| | +--rw profile* [profile-id]
| | +--rw profile-id leafref
| +--......................
MDSC can also configure TCA value directly by the "tca-cfg"
structure:
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--......................
+--rw tca-management
| +--rw tca* [resource-id]
| +--rw resource-id leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--......................
| +--rw tca-cfg
| +--rw tca-indicator* [indicator-name threshold-type period severity]
| +--rw indicator-name string
| +--rw indicator-value string
| +--rw indicator-value-unit string
| +--rw threshold-type enumeration
| +--rw period identityref
| +--rw severity identityref
2.4. Generic Resource
The definition of most performance monitoring interfaces in TMF is
quite generic. And it is also similar that the functionalities of
both alarm and performance monitoring can be defined with a generic
structure, regardless of what kind of object is operated on.
Therefore, our data model prefer to follow this approach. And when
defining our data model, we get refer to [RFC8632], in which a
generic alarm data model is provided. In [RFC8632], a union type of
resource attributes is defined as the source of alarm. So we also
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
reference this structure in our data model.
Additionally, we extend a resource-type attribute to indicate what
exact kind of resource is. Firstly, this attribute can help to
improve interaction efficiency between PNC and MDSC. The MDSC may
quickly identify the resource type from this attribute, without
parsing the resource identifier or searching the resource id in the
whole resource. On the other hand, it will be unified with the
existing IETF topology and inventory objects and form a complete
interface system.
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw resources
+--rw resource* [resource-id]
+--rw resource-id union
+--ro resource-type? identityref
3. Performance Indicator Introduction
//To Be Added
4. Optical Performance Monitoring Tree Diagram
module: ietf-optical-resource-pm
+--rw performance-monitoring
+--rw monitor-tasks
| +--rw monitor-task* [task-id]
| +--rw task-id yang:uuid
| +--rw resource-id? leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--rw task-name? string
| +--rw admin-status? enumeration
| +--ro task-status? enumeration
| +--rw task-cfg
| +--rw period? identityref
| +--rw indicators
| +--rw indicator* [indicator-name]
| +--rw indicator-name string
| +--rw indicator-value-unit? string
+--rw tca-management
| +--rw profiles
| | +--rw profile* [profile-id]
| | +--rw profile-id yang:uuid
| | +--rw profile-name? string
| | +--rw tca-cfg
| | +--rw tca-indicator* [indicator-name threshold-type period severity]
| | +--rw indicator-name string
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
| | +--rw indicator-value string
| | +--rw indicator-value-unit string
| | +--rw threshold-type enumeration
| | +--rw period identityref
| | +--rw severity identityref
| +--rw tcas
| +--rw tca* [resource-id]
| +--rw resource-id leafref
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--rw admin-status? enumeration
| +--rw applied-profiles
| | +--rw profile* [profile-id]
| | +--rw profile-id leafref
| +--rw tca-cfg
| +--rw tca-indicator* [indicator-name threshold-type period severity]
| +--rw indicator-name string
| +--rw indicator-value string
| +--rw indicator-value-unit string
| +--rw threshold-type enumeration
| +--rw period identityref
| +--rw severity identityref
+--rw resources
+--rw resource* [resource-id]
+--rw resource-id union
+--ro resource-type? identityref
rpcs:
+---x get-all-current-pm-data
| +--ro input
| | +--ro resources* leafref
| +--ro output
| +--ro pm-data
| +--ro pm-data-list* [resource]
| +--ro resource leafref
| +--ro collect-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro resource-type? identityref
| +--ro indicator-data
| +--ro indicator-data-list* [indicator-name]
| +--ro indicator-name string
| +--ro indicator-value? string
| +--ro indicator-value-unit? string
+---x get-historic-pm-data
+--ro input
| +--ro resources* leafref
| +--ro start-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro end-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro output
+--ro pm-data
+--ro pm-data-list* [resource]
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
+--ro resource leafref
+--ro collect-time? yang:date-and-time
+--ro resource-type? identityref
+--ro indicator-data
+--ro indicator-data-list* [indicator-name]
+--ro indicator-name string
+--ro indicator-value? string
+--ro indicator-value-unit? string
Figure 1: Optical Resource Performance Monitoring tree diagram
5. YANG Model for Optical Performance Monitoring
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-optical-resource-pm@2023-03-01.yang"
module ietf-optical-resource-pm {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-optical-resource-pm";
prefix optrpm;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-optical-resource-pm-types {
prefix "optrpm-types";
}
organization
"IETF CCAMP Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/>
WG List: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Editor: Chaode Yu
<yuchaode@huawei.com>";
description
"This module defines a model for optical performance
monitoring.
The model fully conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
they appear in all capitals, as shown here.";
revision 2023-03-01 {
description "Initial revision.";
}
container performance-monitoring {
description
"the root node.";
uses monitoring-tasks-grouping;
uses tca-management-grouping;
uses resource-info-grouping;
}
grouping resource-info-grouping {
description
"grouping of resources' PM capabilities related information";
container resources {
description
"resources' PM capabilities related information";
list resource {
description
"list of resource instances";
key resource-id;
leaf resource-id {
type union {
type instance-identifier {
require-instance false;
}
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
type yang:object-identifier;
type string;
type yang:uuid;
}
}
leaf resource-type {
description
"the type of resource, such as NE, board or port";
config false;
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:resource-type;
}
}
//TO BE ADDED: holding-time, capabilities etc.
}
}
}
grouping monitoring-tasks-grouping {
description
"grouping of performance monitoring task";
container monitor-tasks {
description
"Information of PM tasks";
list monitor-task {
description
"monitoring task list";
key task-id;
uses task-instance-grouping;
}
}
}
grouping task-instance-grouping {
description
"grouping of performance monitoring task. In this monitoring
task, the client can specify a resource to run a monitor task
and what kind of performance data need to be monitored.";
leaf task-id {
description
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
"identifier of the performance task";
type yang:uuid;
}
leaf resource-id {
description
"the identifier of network resource on which the performance
monitoring task is running";
type leafref {
path "/optrpm:performance-monitoring/optrpm:resources" +
"/optrpm:resource/optrpm:resource-id";
}
}
leaf resource-type {
description
"the type of resource, such as NE, board or port";
config false;
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:resource-type;
}
}
leaf task-name {
description
"the name of monitoring task";
type string;
}
leaf admin-status {
description
"it is used to control enbling/disabling PM task";
type enumeration {
enum enabled {
description
"it is used to enable the pm task, if the task is enabled,
the task-staus should be running";
}
enum disabled {
description
"it is used to disenable the pm task, if the task is
disabled, the task-staus should be suspended";
}
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
}
}
leaf task-status {
config false;
description
"the status of monitoring task.";
type enumeration {
enum running;
enum suspended;
enum abnormal;
}
}
uses task-configuration-grouping;
}
grouping task-configuration-grouping {
description
"grouping of pm task configuration";
container task-cfg {
description
"Configuration of the monitoring task";
leaf period {
description
"it is used to indicate the interval as per monitoring
task";
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:period;
}
}
container indicators {
description
"performance indicators";
list indicator {
description
"list of PM indicators to be monitored";
key indicator-name;
uses indicator-grouping;
}
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
}
}
}
grouping indicator-grouping {
description
"grouping of a monitoring indicator instance";
leaf indicator-name {
description
"performance indicator's name";
type string;
}
leaf indicator-value-unit {
description
"unit of indicator value";
type string;
}
}
grouping tca-management-grouping {
description
"grouping of configuration and management for Threshol Crossing
Alert";
container tca-management {
description
"configuration and management for Threshol Crossing Alert";
container profiles {
description
"the TCA profile in the whole network";
list profile {
description
"List of TCA profile instances";
key "profile-id";
uses tca-profile-grouping;
}
}
container tcas {
description
"TCA configuration on the network resources.";
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
list tca {
description
"List of TCA configuration instances";
key "resource-id";
leaf resource-id {
description
"the identifier of network resource on which threshold
is configured for TCA purpose";
type leafref {
path "/optrpm:performance-monitoring/optrpm:resources" +
"/optrpm:resource/optrpm:resource-id";
}
}
leaf resource-type {
description
"the type of resource, such as NE, board or termination
point";
config false;
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:resource-type;
}
}
leaf admin-status {
description
"it is used to control the validity of threshold";
type enumeration {
enum enabled {
description
"if the admin-status of TCA configuration is enabled,
the threshold is effective";
}
enum disabled {
description
"if the admin-status of TCA configuration is
disabled, the threshold is not effective";
}
}
}
uses tca-grouping;
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
}
}
}
}
grouping tca-profile-grouping {
description
"grouping of TCA profile instance";
leaf profile-id {
description
"identifier of threshold crossing alerrt profile";
type yang:uuid;
}
leaf profile-name {
description
"Name of the threshold crossing alerrt profile";
type string;
}
container tca-cfg {
description
"detailed TCA configuration in a profile";
list tca-indicator {
description
"list of TCA configuration.";
key "indicator-name threshold-type period severity";
uses tca-indicator-grouping;
}
}
}
grouping tca-indicator-grouping {
description
"grouping for detail TCA configuration";
leaf indicator-name {
type string;
description
"name of the indicator";
}
leaf indicator-value {
mandatory true;
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
type string;
description
"treshold value of the indicator";
}
leaf indicator-value-unit {
mandatory true;
type string;
description
"unit of indicator's value";
}
leaf threshold-type {
description
"it is used to indicate the trigger/clearing condition of
alert upon the threshold";
type enumeration {
enum upperbound-trigger {
description
"If the performace data exceeds this threshold value,
a TCA will be triggered";
}
enum lowerbound-trigger {
description
"if the performace data is lower than this threshold
value, a TCA will be triggered";
}
enum upperbound-clear {
description
"If the performance data is not longer bigger than this
threshold value, the TCA triggered before will be cleared
by system automatically";
}
enum lowerbound-clear {
description
"If the performance data is not longer lower than this
threshold value, the TCA triggered before will be cleared
by system automatically";
}
}
}
leaf period {
description
"it is used to indicate the interval as per monitoring task";
type identityref {
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
base optrpm-types:period;
}
}
leaf severity {
description
"it is used to indicate what severity level of alert would be
triggered if not confirms to the threashold";
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:severity;
}
}
}
grouping tca-grouping {
description
"grouping of TCA configuration";
container applied-profiles {
description
"Information of applied TCA profiles on this resource";
list profile {
description
"list of applied TCA profile";
key "profile-id";
leaf profile-id {
description
"identifier of the applied TCA profile";
type leafref {
path "../../../../../optrpm:profiles/optrpm:profile" +
"/optrpm:profile-id";
}
}
}
}
container tca-cfg {
description
"detailed configuration of TCA";
list tca-indicator {
description
"list of tca indicator configuration";
key "indicator-name threshold-type period severity";
uses tca-indicator-grouping;
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
}
}
}
rpc get-all-current-pm-data {
description
"this RPC is used to retrieve current performance data.";
input {
leaf-list resources {
description
"the identifier of resources from which current performace
data is collected";
type leafref {
path "/optrpm:performance-monitoring/optrpm:resources" +
"/optrpm:resource/optrpm:resource-id";
}
}
}
output {
container pm-data {
description
"result of current performance data";
list pm-data-list {
description
"list of curent performance data";
key resource;
uses pm-data-instance-grouping;
}
}
}
}
rpc get-historic-pm-data {
input {
description
"this RPC is used to retrieve historic performance data.";
leaf-list resources {
description
"the identifier of resources from which historic performace
data is collected";
type leafref {
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
path "/optrpm:performance-monitoring/optrpm:resources" +
"/optrpm:resource/optrpm:resource-id";
}
}
leaf start-time {
description
"the starttime of performance data needed to be retrieved";
type yang:date-and-time;
}
leaf end-time {
description
"the endtime of performance data needed to be retrieved";
type yang:date-and-time;
}
}
output {
container pm-data {
description
"result of historic performance data";
list pm-data-list {
description
"list of historic performance data";
key resource;
uses pm-data-instance-grouping;
}
}
}
}
grouping pm-data-instance-grouping {
description
"grouping for common attributes of performance data";
leaf resource {
description
"the identifier of network resource which is monitored.";
type leafref {
path "/optrpm:performance-monitoring/optrpm:resources" +
"/optrpm:resource/optrpm:resource-id";
}
}
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
leaf collect-time {
description
"the time of this data is collected";
type yang:date-and-time;
}
leaf resource-type {
description
"the type of resource, such as NE, board or port";
type identityref {
base optrpm-types:resource-type;
}
}
container indicator-data {
description
"grouping for historic performance data";
list indicator-data-list {
description
"list of historic performance data";
key indicator-name;
uses indicator-data-instance-grouping;
}
}
}
grouping indicator-data-instance-grouping {
description
"grouping for a performance data";
leaf indicator-name {
description
"name of performance data indicator";
type string;
}
leaf indicator-value {
description
"value of performance data";
type string;
}
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
leaf indicator-value-unit {
description
"unit of performance data value";
type string;
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 2: Optical Resource Performance Monitoring YANG module
6. YANG Model for Optical Performance Monitoring Types
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-optical-resource-pm-types@2023-03-01.yang"
module ietf-optical-resource-pm-types {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-optical-resource-pm-types";
prefix optrpm-types;
organization
"IETF CCAMP Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/>
WG List: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Editor: Chaode Yu
<yuchaode@huawei.com>";
description
"This module defines types model for optical performance
monitoring which will be imported by ietf-performance-monitoring
data model.
The model fully conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA).
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons
identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see
the RFC itself for full legal notices.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
they appear in all capitals, as shown here.";
revision 2023-03-01 {
description "Initial revision.";
}
identity resource-type {
description "this is the base type of all the rerource type";
}
identity network-element {
base resource-type;
description "NE resource type";
}
identity board {
base resource-type;
description "board resource type";
}
identity termination-point {
base resource-type;
description "Termination point resource";
}
identity tunnel-termination-point {
base resource-type;
description "Tunnel termination point resource";
}
identity period {
description
"this is the base type of all the performace monitoring priod
type.";
}
identity period-15-minutes {
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
base period;
description
"the during of monitoring task will be repeated at every 15
minutes";
}
identity period-24-hours {
base period;
description
"the during of monitoring task will be repeated at every 24
hours";
}
identity severity {
description
"it is used to indicate what severity alarm will be caused if
exceeds the threshold";
}
identity critical {
description
"critical alarm will be caused if exceeds the threshold";
base severity;
}
identity mayjor {
description
"mayjor alarm will be caused if exceeds the threshold";
base severity;
}
identity minor {
description
"minor alarm will be caused if exceeds the threshold";
base severity;
}
identity warning {
description
"only a warning will be caused if exceeds the threshold";
base severity;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Figure 3: Optical Resource Performance Monitoring Types YANG module
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
7. Manageability Considerations
<Add any manageability considerations>
8. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to
restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. Considerations in Section 8 of
[RFC8795]are also applicable to their subtrees in the module defined
in this document.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. Considerations in Section 8 of
[RFC8795] are also applicable to their subtrees in the module defined
in this document.
9. IANA Considerations
This document registers following YANG modules in the YANG Module
Names registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-optical-resource-pm namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-optical-resource-pm prefix: optrpm
reference: RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Optical Performance
Monitoring
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
name: ietf-optical-resource-pm-types namespace:
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-optical-resource-pm-types prefix:
optrpm-types reference: RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Optical
Performance Monitoring
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7446] Lee, Y., Ed., Bernstein, G., Ed., Li, D., and W. Imajuku,
"Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for
Wavelength Switched Optical Networks", RFC 7446,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7446, February 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7446>.
[RFC7581] Bernstein, G., Ed., Lee, Y., Ed., Li, D., Imajuku, W., and
J. Han, "Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information
Encoding for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks",
RFC 7581, DOI 10.17487/RFC7581, June 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7581>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8795] Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and
O. Gonzalez de Dios, "YANG Data Model for Traffic
Engineering (TE) Topologies", RFC 8795,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8795, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8795>.
[TMF-518] TM Forum (TMF), "Resource Performance Management",
TMF518_RPM , 2011,
<https://www.tmforum.org/resources/collection/mtosi-4-0>.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm]
Wu, B., Wu, Q., Boucadair, M., de Dios, O. G., and B. Wen,
"A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance
Monitoring", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-15, 11 November 2022,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-
yang-vpn-service-pm-15>.
[I-D.ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics]
Lee, Y., Dhody, D., Vilalta, R., King, D., and D.
Ceccarelli, "YANG models for Virtual Network (VN)/TE
Performance Monitoring Telemetry and Scaling Intent
Autonomics", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-09, 11 July 2022,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-
actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-09>.
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
[I-D.zheng-ccamp-client-pm-yang]
Zheng, H., Busi, I., Yanlei, Z., Lopez, V., and O. G. de
Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Client Signal Performance
Monitoring", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
zheng-ccamp-client-pm-yang-07, 9 January 2023,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zheng-ccamp-
client-pm-yang-07>.
[RFC8454] Lee, Y., Belotti, S., Dhody, D., Ceccarelli, D., and B.
Yoon, "Information Model for Abstraction and Control of TE
Networks (ACTN)", RFC 8454, DOI 10.17487/RFC8454,
September 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8454>.
[RFC8632] Vallin, S. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for Alarm
Management", RFC 8632, DOI 10.17487/RFC8632, September
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8632>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
Acknowledgments
This document was prepared using kramdown.
Authors' Addresses
Chaode Yu
Huawei Technologies
Email: yuchaode@huawei.com
Fabio Peruzzini
TIM
Email: fabio.peruzzini@telecomitalia.it
Yanlei Zheng
China Unicom
Email: zhengyanlei@chinaunicom.cn
Italo Busi
Huawei Technologies
Email: italo.busi@huawei.com
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Optical Resource Performance Monitoring March 2023
Aihua Guo
Futurewei Technologies
Email: aihuaguo.ietf@gmail.com
Yu, et al. Expires 14 September 2023 [Page 33]