%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-lamps-est-renewal-info instead of this I-D.
@techreport{yusef-lamps-rfc7030-renewal-recommendation-03,
    number =    {draft-yusef-lamps-rfc7030-renewal-recommendation-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-lamps-rfc7030-renewal-recommendation/03/},
    author =    {Rifaat Shekh-Yusef and Michael Richardson and Mike Ounsworth},
    title =     {{Certificate Renewal Recommendations for Enrollment over Secure Transport}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2025,
    month =     oct,
    day =       3,
    abstract =  {This document describes an extension to RFC7030, Enrollment over Secure Transport to give an indication to a end-entity device when it should start attempting to renew its certificates. Prior art is that client decides, with a typical recommmendation to start when the remaining lifetime of the certificate is at the 50\% point. As typical certificate lifetimes are reduced from years to fractions of a year, the 50\% may be far too early, and this document provides a way to give alternate advice.},
}