EAP Authentication Identity Protection
draft-zcao-emu-id-protection-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Zehn Cao , Dapeng Liu , DENG Hui | ||
| Last updated | 2010-07-03 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The EAP framework does not provide an effective way to protect the peer's identity. This creates the risk of identity forgery. This document revisits the EAP identity protection problem, and proposes a solution to this problem via the use of Cryptographically Binding Identity (CBID).
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)