Skip to main content

Data Collection Requirements and Technologies for Digital Twin Network
draft-zcz-nmrg-digitaltwin-data-collection-02

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Authors Cheng Zhou , Danyang Chen , Pedro Martinez-Julia , Qiufang Ma
Last updated 2023-03-12
Replaces draft-zhu-nmrg-digitaltwin-data-collection
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-zcz-nmrg-digitaltwin-data-collection-02
Internet Research Task Force                                     C. Zhou
Internet-Draft                                                   D. Chen
Intended status: Informational                              China Mobile
Expires: 13 September 2023                             P. Martinez-Julia
                                                                    NICT
                                                                   Q. Ma
                                                                  Huawei
                                                           12 March 2023

 Data Collection Requirements and Technologies for Digital Twin Network
             draft-zcz-nmrg-digitaltwin-data-collection-02

Abstract

   A Digital Twin Network is a virtual representation of a physical
   network, which is meant to be used by a management system to analyze,
   diagnose, emulate and control the physical network based on
   monitoring information, data, models, and interfaces.  The
   construction and state update of a Digital Twin Network require
   obtaining real-time information of the physical network it represents
   (i.e., telemetry data).  This document aims to describe the data
   collection requirements and provide data collection methods or tools
   to build the data repository for building and updating a digital twin
   network.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 September 2023.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Definitions and Acronyms  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Data Collection Requirements for Digital Twin Network . . . .   4
     3.1.  Target-driven and On-demand Collection  . . . . . . . . .   4
     3.2.  Diverse Tools for Various Data Collection . . . . . . . .   4
     3.3.  Lightweight and Efficient Collection  . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.4.  Open and Standardized Interfaces  . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.5.  Naming for Caching  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     3.6.  Efficient Multi-Destination Delivery  . . . . . . . . . .   6
   4.  Data Collection Technologies for Digital Twin Network . . . .   6
     4.1.  Existing Data Collection Methods/Tools  . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.2.  Innovation Directions on Data Collection  . . . . . . . .   7
   5.  Knowledge and Instruction Driven Data Collection Method for
           Digital Twin Network  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.1.  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.2.  Efficient Data Collection Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     5.3.  Data Collection Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
     5.4.  Query and Aggregation Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   6.  Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   8.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   9.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     9.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
     9.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

1.  Introduction

   With the deployment of Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing and
   data center, etc., the scale of the current network is expanded
   gradually.  However, the increase of network scale also leads to an
   increase in the complexity of the current network, and it induces
   plenty of problems.  In order to improve the autonomy ability of
   network and reduce potential negative effects on physical and virtual
   networks, we consider that an endogenous intelligent and autonomous
   network architecture which achieves self-optimization and decision is
   indispensable (in general, self-management and self-operation).  The
   digital twin technology answers to the challenge of building self-
   management systems because it can optimize and validate policies
   through real-time and interactive mapping with physical
   entities.[I-D.irtf-nmrg-network-digital-twin-arch]

   Data is the cornerstone required for constructing a digital twin for
   a network, namely a Digital Twin Network (DTN).  In the face of large
   network scale, data collection, storage and management are faced with
   great challenges.  So, data collection methods and tools should meet
   the requirements of target-driven, diversity, lightweight and
   efficiency, while being open and standardized.  Among all the
   requirements, achieving a lightweight and efficient data collection
   method is of the most importance.  If the full-data collection method
   is adopted, huge storage space and bandwidth resource are needed,
   especially for complex scenarios that require real-time data and
   traffic from multi-source and heterogeneous devices.  Therefore, it
   is extremely important to agree on lightweight and efficient data
   collection, aggregation, and correlation methods, toward building the
   transmission of monitoring information (telemetry data), processing,
   and storage required to build a DTN system.

   This document aims to describe the data collection requirements and
   proposes efficient data collection methods or tools to build the data
   repository for digital twin network.

2.  Definitions and Acronyms

   PN: Physical Network

   IMC: Instruction Management Center

   DSC: Data Storage Center

   DTN: Digital Twin Network

   TSE: Telemetry Streaming Element

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 3]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   RDF: Resource Description Framework

   CEP: Complex Event Processing

3.  Data Collection Requirements for Digital Twin Network

3.1.  Target-driven and On-demand Collection

   The monitoring data of a network is the basis to build a DTN system.
   Such data is collected from physical and virtual networks.  It
   includes, but is not limited to, the following types:

   *  Provisional and operational status of physical or virtual devices,
      as well as the network topology with all network elements.

   *  Configuration data that is required to transform a network system
      from its initial default state into its current state.

   *  Running status of physical, logical, or virtual ports and links.

   *  Logs and events records of all the network elements.

   *  Statistics (packet loss, traffic throughput, latency, etc.) of
      flows and ports.

   *  Various data regarding users and services.

   *  Life-cycle operation data of all network elements.

   *  All above data in time series.

   The collection of the monitoring information from a network required
   for maintaining a DTN (telemetry data) should be in target-driven and
   on-demand mode.  It is not always necessary to collect all monitoring
   information from the network (telemetry data) listed above because of
   the high cost of resources (CPU, memory, bandwidth etc.).  The type,
   frequency and method of data collection aim to meet the application
   of a DTN depend on the specific network topology and application
   requirements.

3.2.  Diverse Tools for Various Data Collection

   The different types of monitoring information required to maintain a
   DTN (telemetry data) have several characteristics.  Some data (e.g.
   hardware status, environmental data, etc.) requires lower collecting
   frequency, and some data (e.g. flow status, link fault, etc.) needs
   to be of higher level of real-time.  Some data (e.g. device status,
   port statistics, etc.) can be collected directly and simply via

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 4]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   normal tools, while some data (e.g. per-flow latency, traffic matrix,
   etc.) can only be acquired through complex network measurement
   technologies.  It is impossible to find or define a uniform data
   collection method that are suitable for all types of data.
   Therefore, multiple tools or methods are needed to collect the
   different types of data required to build the DTN entity.

3.3.  Lightweight and Efficient Collection

   Data collection tools and methods should be as lightweight as
   possible, so as to reduce the occupation of network equipment
   resources and ensure that data collection does not affect the normal
   operation of the network.  The major requirements are listed as
   below.

   *  Data collection tools and methods need to improve efficiency of
      execution, reduce the cost of computing, storage and communication
      bandwidth.

   *  The collection of redundant data should be avoided or minimized.

   *  For the data set that needs to be collected, making full use of
      the data compression technology, to reduce the resource cost in
      the collection phase.  There must be lossy and lossless
      compression methods available by data sources, which will be
      applied together with other functions before data is transmitted.

3.4.  Open and Standardized Interfaces

   Data collection interfaces used to build the DTN should be open and
   standardized to help avoid either hardware or software vendor lock,
   and achieve inter-operability.  The major requirements of data
   collection interfaces are:

   *  Support configuration management, including the data collection
      protocol, frequency or period, etc.

   *  Support several rate options (e.g. minute-level, 10-second level,
      second level (near real time), and real time level) to accommodate
      different data requirements from applications.

   *  Be extensible so that more features can be added with limited
      parameter changes and with backward compatibility.

   *  Be able to provide secure and reliable information exchange
      mechanism.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 5]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   *  Be able to enforce federation policies to allow information to be
      exchangeable among domains while ensuring authorization and
      scoping is controlled.

3.5.  Naming for Caching

   Both raw monitoring information (telemetry data) and knowledge items
   obtained from monitoring must be able to be addressed uniquely.  This
   means to give a unique identifier or "name" to each data or knowledge
   item that references it.  This name will be used by caching
   mechanisms to store the data and provide it for clients that request
   it, which will also use such name.

   Global names and federated names must be supported.  A name schema,
   name hierarchy, and name part ontology must be defined and maintained
   together with other naming systems, such as DNS for global names.

3.6.  Efficient Multi-Destination Delivery

   The maintenance of DTN systems will not be the sole purpose of
   monitoring information and knowledge communication.  Other
   applications would also request raw monitoring information (telemetry
   data) or knowledge items.  They can use the name to identify it.  The
   monitoring system (telemetry system), following the recommendations
   of RFC 9232 [RFC9232], will deliver the requested data or knowledge
   items to the requesters as much efficiently as possible.  On the one
   hand, items will be provided by the closest cache to the destination
   of the data.  On the other hand, items will be replicated in the best
   nodes, following an efficient multi-cast spanning tree.  Different
   underlying protocols can be used to achieve this mechanism.

   Delivering knowledge items instead of raw telemetry data enables
   digital twins to be aware of the context of data and highly relieve
   from hard processing, which will be performed by the entities which
   are best suited for running each type of processing.

4.  Data Collection Technologies for Digital Twin Network

4.1.  Existing Data Collection Methods/Tools

   Currently, some widely-used tools, such as SNMP, RESTCONF [RFC8040],
   NETCONF [RFC6241], Telemetry, INT (In-band Network Telemetry), DPI
   (Deep Packet Inspection), IPFIX [RFC7011], etc. can be candidate
   tools to collect data for digital twin network.  YANG data model and
   associated mechanisms defined in [RFC8639][RFC8641] enable
   subscriber-specific subscriptions to a publisher's event streams, and
   can help subscriber applications to request a continuous and
   customized stream of updates from a YANG datastore.  [RFC9232]'s

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 6]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   Appendix-A gives a survey on existing network telemetry techniques,
   which explores an overview of management plane, control plane and
   data plane telemetry techniques and standards.

   Moreover, some new innovation methods can help increase the data
   collection efficiency.  For example,
   [I-D.claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest] proposes a YANG model to
   store contextual information along with the collected data in order
   to keep the collected data exploitable; [RFC7594] introduces a
   measurement method named Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband
   Performance (LMAP) that works in a coordinated fashion to perform
   network performance measurement tasks.  The proposed framework
   includes the following components:

   *  The controller that instructs measurement agents regarding which
      performance metrics to measure, when to measure them, and how/when
      to report the measurement results to a collector

   *  The measurement agent that performs passive or active measurement
      tasks and reports measurement results to the collector

   *  The collector that receives measurement result from a measurement
      agent

4.2.  Innovation Directions on Data Collection

   Current data collection methods and tools (YANG, xCONF, SNMP,
   Telemetry, etc.) listed above can help acquire network data to build
   a Digital Twin Network system, which may be with low maturity and
   low-level capabilities of data service and data modelling.  To build
   a more mature DTN system with high-level capabilities, it is
   necessary to study more innovative data collection technologies.  The
   following are several potential innovation directions.

   *  High-performance data collection technology based on programmable
      circuits.

   *  Measurement methods for complex monitoring information such as
      network performance and network traffic.

   *  Collaborative data collection technology for multiple data
      sources.

   *  Distributed and collaborative data collection technology for
      complex network, and the time synchronization problem of data
      acquisition.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 7]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   *  Provision of processed information, jointly and separately, by
      applying the function indicated by data requester.

   *  Assessment of federation policies in data provisioning to enable
      cross-domain data provision and implement multi-domain digital
      twin scenarios.

5.  Knowledge and Instruction Driven Data Collection Method for Digital
    Twin Network

5.1.  Overview

   The DTN's data repository sub-system manages all network data, in
   real time, from the PN to the DTN.  Sufficient and timely data are
   always required to construct the twin entity and various data models.
   However the existing methods collect the full data from the PN for
   modeling, and do not consider problems like time-lag, insufficient
   storage resources, low computational efficiency and waste of
   bandwidth resources caused by data transmission.  In order to solve
   these problems, this section introduces an efficient data collection
   method, named "knowledge and instruction driven data collection".
   This data collection method is based on sending instructions to the
   elements of the PN for them to pre-process the data (data cleaning or
   knowledge representation) before sending it back to be applied to the
   DTN.

5.2.  Efficient Data Collection Mechanism

   The management system structure consists of the PN and the DTN.  The
   PN includes multiple Data Storage Centers (DSC) and Telemetry
   Streaming Element (TSE), and the DTN includes the Instruction
   Management Center (IMC) and Data Storage Center (DSC).  The TSE has
   multiple functions, including data collection, data aggregation, data
   correlation, knowledge representation and query, etc.  In addition, a
   Complex Event Processing (CEP) engine is integrated into TSE to
   perform queries to the streamed data.  The IMC has two functions.  On
   the one hand, it is used to manage the registration of the DSC in the
   PN side, and its registration information can include various key
   information such as the IP address of the DSC in the PN side, chosen
   data type, and various index names in the data, data source name and
   data size, etc.  On the other hand, it is used to adaptively
   configure data collection instructions according to the collection
   requirements of the DSC in the DTN side and search for IP addresses
   to send instructions.  The instruction-carrying information includes
   rule-based mathematical expressions, executable models in .exe
   format, dynamic collection frequency, parameter lists, program text
   files in .m format, text files with parameter configuration, and
   other types of files.  Instructions are flexible and programmable,

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 8]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   and can be created, modified, combined, and deleted at any time
   according to requirements.  When the DSC of the DTN side requests
   data to the IMC, the IMC searches the IP address of the DSC in the
   database with the registration information, which is built according
   to critical information, such as data type and data name, and
   functional instructions for data processing or knowledge
   representation can be implemented depending on the demand
   configuration.  The DSC of the DTN side stores the effective
   information after data processing and knowledge representation
   returned by the TSE.

   The DSC in the PN side has two functions.  On the one hand, it stores
   data of various types, such as performance indicators, operational
   status, log, traffic scheduling, business requirements, etc.  On the
   other hand, it has the function of automatically parsing the
   instructions sent by the TSE.  Then the operating environment of the
   instruction is configured according to the instruction needs, and
   data processing or knowledge representation is performed based on the
   instruction.  Data processing mainly includes data cleaning, filling
   missing data, normalization, conflict verification, etc.  Knowledge
   representation refers to the representation of the original data as a
   data structure that can be used for efficient computation.  Such
   representation results are closer to machine language, which is
   conducive to the rapid and accurate construction of the model.  The
   role of knowledge representation is to represent the original data as
   a data structure that can be used to efficiently calculate.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023               [Page 9]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

       +------------------------------+   +-----------------------+
       |   Physical  Network          |   |  Digital Twin Network |
       | +-----+    +-----+  +------+ |   |  +------+  +-------+  |
       | |     |    |     |  |      | |   |  |      |  |       |  |
       | | DSC |... | DSC |  | TSE  | |   |  |  IMC |  |  DSC  |  |
       | |     |    |     |  |      | |   |  |      |  |       |  |
       | +-+---+    +--+--+  +---+--+ |   |  +---+--+  +----+--+  |
       |   |           |         |    |   |      |          |     |
       +------------------------------+   +-----------------------+
           |           |         |               |          |
           | 1.1. Register       |               |          |
           +-----------+--------->               |          |
           |           |         |               |          |
           |           | 1.2. Register           |          |
           |           +--------->               |          |
           |           |         | 1.3. Register |          |
           |           |         +--------------->          |
           |           |         |             2. Data req. |
           |           |         |               <----------+
           |           |         | 3. Query and instruction |
           |           |         |    configuration         |
           |           |         |               +          |
           |           |         4. Send instructions       |
           |           |         <---------------+          |
           |           |         |               |          |
           |           |   5. Parse and execute  |          |
           |           |      instruction        |          |
           | 6. Data subscript.  |               |          |
           <---------------------+               |          |
           | 7. Knowledge        |               |          |
           |    representation   |               |          |
           |     8. Data pushing |               |          |
           +--------------------->               |          |
           |           | 9. Data aggregation and |          |
           |           |    correlation          |          |
           |           |         | 10. Send processed data  |
           |           |         +-------------------------->
           |           |         |               |          |

                     Figure 1: Data Collection Process

5.3.  Data Collection Process

   The specific process is as follows:

   *  The DSC in the PN side registers into the TSE.  The TSE registers
      into the IMC.  Both provide their IP addresses, the data type, the
      data source, the data size, etc.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 10]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   *  The DSC in the DTN side sends the data collection request to the
      IMC.

   *  According to the data collection request, the IMC intelligently
      queries the registration addressing information and configures the
      data processing instruction.

   *  The IMC in the DTN side sends the corresponding instruction
      according to the query result to the TSE.

   *  After receiving the instructions, the TSE parses them and executes
      them.  The query function can be performed by the CEP engine,
      which receives all monitoring information (telemetry data) and
      processes it with all queries provided.

   *  The TSE sends data subscription to DSC in the PN side.

   *  The DSC in the PN side represents the data semantically in RDF
      form or sends the data in raw form to the TSE for it to make the
      semantic representation.

   *  The DSC in the PN side pushes the data or knowledge item to the
      TSE.

   *  The TSE aggregates and correlates the collected data or knowledge
      items.  Then, according to the actual needs, generates aggregated
      data or knowledge items.

   *  The TSE sends the resulting data or knowledge items to the DSC in
      the DTN side.

5.4.  Query and Aggregation Functions

   The TSE supports an arbitrary number of queries and aggregation
   functions.  As a minimum, it will support:

   *  A function to apply a particular calculation to the values
      retrievied from a specified metric for a specified period of time.
      The basically supported calculations must be:

      -  Average: Returns the single number resulting from averaging all
         values in the period.

      -  Maximum: Returns the single number that represents the highest
         value in the period.

      -  Minimum: Returns the single number that represents the lowest
         value in the period.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 11]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

      -  Percentile X: Returns the percentile of calculated at position
         X (from 0, which is the minimum, to 100, which is the maximum).

      -  Moving Average X: Transforms all values of the specified period
         by calculating every value as the average of the previous X
         values (or less if there are not enough).

      -  Filter Previous X: Removes the values that change less than X
         percent from the previous value.

      -  Filter Average X: Removes the values that change less than X
         percent from the average value.

      -  Filter Moving Average X Y: Removes the values that change less
         than Y percent from the value of the moving average for X
         previous values.

   *  A function to represent the collected values in a semantic
      structure following some ontology, information model, and data
      format (YANG).  This will enforce semantic constraints to the
      values, such as avoiding negative measures of some parameters
      (e.g., bandwidth usage).

   *  A function to analyze the collected values to detect some pattern
      (provided) and, if so, trigger some notification that other module
      can use to execute some action.

   The particular behavior of the three functions will be described in a
   high-level language that is transformed to the specific code used by
   the device, such as [P4].

6.  Summary

   This draft describes the requirements for data collection and
   provides the data collection methods or tools required to build the
   data repository for maintaining DTN systems.  These data collection
   methods or tools should meet the requirement of target-driven,
   diversity, lightweight and efficiency, while being open and
   standardized.  Among all the requirements, lightweight and efficiency
   requirements are the most important.  Thus, this draft provides a
   lightweight and efficient method for data collection that is
   particularly optimized for maintaining DTN systems.  Going forward,
   more methods (transformation and aggregation functions) and tools
   (solutions) shall be studied to extend the contents of this draft.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 12]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

7.  Security Considerations

   TBD.

8.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no requests to IANA.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8639]  Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
              E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
              RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.

   [RFC8641]  Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
              for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
              September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.

   [RFC9232]  Song, H., Qin, F., Martinez-Julia, P., Ciavaglia, L., and
              A. Wang, "Network Telemetry Framework", RFC 9232,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9232, May 2022,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9232>.

9.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest]
              Claise, B., Quilbeuf, J., Lopez, D., Martinez-Casanueva,
              I. D., and T. Graf, "A Data Manifest for Contextualized
              Telemetry Data", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
              claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06, 10 March 2023,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-claise-
              opsawg-collected-data-manifest-06>.

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 13]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   [I-D.irtf-nmrg-network-digital-twin-arch]
              Zhou, C., Yang, H., Duan, X., Lopez, D., Pastor, A., Wu,
              Q., Boucadair, M., and C. Jacquenet, "Digital Twin
              Network: Concepts and Reference Architecture", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-irtf-nmrg-network-digital-
              twin-arch-02, 24 October 2022,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-nmrg-
              network-digital-twin-arch-02>.

   [P4]       The P4 Language Consortium, "P4 Language Specification
              (https://p4.org/p4-spec/docs/P4-16-v-1.2.3.html)", 11 July
              2022.

   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC7011]  Claise, B., Ed., Trammell, B., Ed., and P. Aitken,
              "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
              Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information", STD 77,
              RFC 7011, DOI 10.17487/RFC7011, September 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7011>.

   [RFC7594]  Eardley, P., Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Burbridge, T.,
              Aitken, P., and A. Akhter, "A Framework for Large-Scale
              Measurement of Broadband Performance (LMAP)", RFC 7594,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7594, September 2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7594>.

   [RFC8040]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

Authors' Addresses

   Cheng Zhou
   China Mobile
   Beijing
   100053
   China
   Email: zhouchengyjy@chinamobile.com

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 14]
Internet-Draft            Network Working Group               March 2023

   Danyang Chen
   China Mobile
   Beijing
   100053
   China
   Email: chendanyang@chinamobile.com

   Pedro Martinez-Julia
   NICT
   4-2-1, Nukui-Kitamachi, Koganei, Tokyo
   184-8795
   Japan
   Email: pedro@nict.go.jp

   Qiufang Ma
   Huawei
   Nanjing
   210012
   China
   Email: maqiufang1@huawei.com

Zhou, et al.            Expires 13 September 2023              [Page 15]