Skip to main content

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Modify-Increment Extension
draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-01

Yes

(Ted Hardie)

No Objection

(Margaret Cullen)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2005-07-07) Unknown
I have no grounds to delay this, but I have two questions

1. Is it really Informational (describing existing practice), or
should it be Experimental (as in the preamble to the draft) since it appears
to describe proposed practice?

2. Does this extension *guarantee* atomicity, or simply improve the chances
of atomicity compared to a read/increment/write sequence? It might be nice
to state this explicitly.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown