Lightweight Directory Access Protocol version 3 (LDAPv3): All Operational Attributes
draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-05
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2003-12-19
|
05 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2003-07-08
|
05 | Natalia Syracuse | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Syracuse, Natalia |
2003-07-07
|
05 | Michael Lee | State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation by Lee, Michael |
2003-07-07
|
05 | (System) | IESG has approved the document |
2003-06-05
|
05 | Ted Hardie | State Changes to IESG Evaluation :: AD Followup from IESG Evaluation :: Point Raised - writeup needed by Hardie, Ted |
2003-06-05
|
05 | Michael Lee | Substate changed after consulting with Harald Alvestrand |
2003-06-05
|
05 | Michael Lee | State Changes to IESG Evaluation :: Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Lee, Michael |
2003-03-24
|
05 | Ted Hardie | Shepherding AD has been changed to Hardie, Ted from Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-05
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-05.txt |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | A new version of the document just sent to the I-D repository. |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | Kurt: Attached is a minor revision addressing the issues we discussed. (I will send a separate note to IANA.) |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | Ok with Thomas |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-11-01
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | State Changes to IESG Evaluation :: 0 from IESG Evaluation :: AD Followup by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-10-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | The new version is solving the issues Thomas had (author claim). Ping:ed Thomas Narten. |
2002-10-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-10-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | Thomas: Note: this note contains question/issues on both of two documents: o Feature Discovery in LDAP (Proposed) o LDAPv3: All Operational Attributes (Proposed) … Thomas: Note: this note contains question/issues on both of two documents: o Feature Discovery in LDAP (Proposed) o LDAPv3: All Operational Attributes (Proposed) In: o Feature Discovery in LDAP (Proposed) would be nice if document gave examples of the kind of features that would be discoverable using the technique described in this document. Is this really needed or a good thing? I.e., it smells to me (not that I know much about LDAP) as a way of discoverying/advertising support for extremely fine-grained features. Is this good for interoperability? Is there a registry for these features? If not, isn't this bad for interoperability? I.e, how do I know which features I'm looking for? Or, is this in fact just for vendor-specific things where the client knows what its asking for and the (same vendor) server knows the same, and neither cares about stuff supported by other vendors? o LDAPv3: All Operational Attributes (Proposed) Servers supporting this feature SHOULD publish the Object Identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.5.1 as a value of supportedFeatures [FEATURES] attribute in the root DSE. Same general question as above. Where is this OID registered? I gather it doesn't need to be. I.e, the OID is just being used as a globally-unique identifier. That's OK, for those cases where a document says "this OID means XXX" (as in this specific case). Seems less good if arbitrary features can be assigned OIDs and there is no way to figure out what OID corresponds to what feature. 4. Security Considerations This document provides a mechanism which clients may use to discover operational attributes. Pretty content free. Those relying on security by obscurity SHOULD implement appropriate access controls to restricts access to operational attributes per local policy. Is this all that needs to be said here? Editorial nits follow. The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) supports a mechanism for requesting the return of all user attributes but does not all operational attributes. This document describes an LDAP extension sentence doesn't parse. attributes. The mechanism is designed for use with existing general purpose LDAP clients (including web browsers which support LDAP URLs) and existing LDAP API. s/and/and the/ ? controls or other restrictions. Clients implementors should also note s/Clients/Client/ operational attributes using existing LDAP clients. In particular, the mechanism is designed to be compatible with existing general purpose LDAP clients includes web browsers which support LDAP URLs [RFC2255]. doesn't parse |
2002-10-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | by Faltstrom, Patrik |
2002-08-05
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-04.txt |
2002-07-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | Check with Thomas if he remember...his discuss is not on the ballot page. We'll see what happens. |
2002-07-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | A new comment added by paf |
2002-07-29
|
05 | Patrik Fältström | State Changes to Discuss fix received from New Version Needed (WG/Author) … State Changes to Discuss fix received from New Version Needed (WG/Author) by paf |
2002-05-17
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-03.txt |
2002-04-09
|
05 | (System) | State Changes to New Version Needed (WG/Author) from Ready for Telechat by IETF Secretariat |
2002-03-27
|
05 | (System) | State Changes to 20 from 18 by 0 |
2002-01-14
|
05 | (System) | Last call sent |
2001-11-26
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-02.txt |
2001-06-27
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-01.txt |
2001-04-04
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-zeilenga-ldap-opattrs-00.txt |