Skip to main content

A Description of the Rabbit Stream Cipher Algorithm
draft-zenner-rabbit-02

The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 4503.
Authors Martin Boesgaard, Mette Vesterager, Erik Zenner
Last updated 2020-01-21 (Latest revision 2005-11-28)
RFC stream Independent Submission
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Stream ISE state (None)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Became RFC 4503 (Informational)
Action Holders
(None)
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD Russ Housley
Send notices to (None)
draft-zenner-rabbit-02
Internet Draft                    M. Boesgaard, M. Vesterager, E. Zenner
                                                            Cryptico A/S
                                                       November 22, 2005

This document expires May 22, 2006                  

         A Description of the Rabbit Stream Cipher Algorithm
                  <draft-zenner-rabbit-02.txt>

IPR Statement

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any 
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware 
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes 
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

Internet-Draft Boilerplate

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html

Abstract

   This document describes the encryption algorithm Rabbit. It is a
   stream cipher algorithm with a 128-bit key and 64-bit IV. The method
   was published in 2003 and has been subject to public security and
   performance revision. Its high performance makes it particularly
   suited for the use with internet protocols where large amounts of
   data have to be processed. 

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 1]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

1.  Introduction

   Rabbit is a stream cipher algorithm that has been designed for high 
   performance in software implementations.  Both key setup and 
   encryption are very fast, making the algorithm particularly suited 
   for all applications where large amounts of data or large numbers of
   data packages have to be encrypted.  Examples include, but are not 
   limited to, server-side encryption, multimedia encryption, hard-disk 
   encryption, and encryption on limited-resource devices. 

   The cipher is based on ideas derived from the behavior of certain 
   chaotic maps.  These maps have been carefully discretized, resulting
   in a compact stream cipher.  Rabbit has been openly published in 2003 
   [1] and has not displayed any weaknesses to the time of this writing. 
   To ensure ongoing security evaluation, it was also submitted to the
   ECRYPT eSTREAM project[2].

   Technically, Rabbit consists of a pseudorandom bitstream generator 
   that takes a 128-bit key and a 64-bit initialization vector (IV) as 
   input and generates a stream of 128-bit blocks.  Encryption is
   performed by combining this output with the message, using the 
   exclusive-OR operation.  Decryption is performed in exactly the same 
   way as encryption. 

   Further information about Rabbit, including reference implementation,
   test vectors, performance figures, and security white papers, is
   available from http://www.cryptico.com/. 

2.  Algorithm Description

2.1  Notation

   This document uses the following elementary operators:

    +     integer addition. 
    *     integer multiplication.
   div    integer division.
   mod    integer modulus.
    ^     bitwise exclusive-OR operation.
   <<<    left rotation operator.
    ||    concatenation operator.

   When labeling bits of a variable A, the least significant bit is
   denoted by A[0].  The notation A[h..g] represents bits h through g of
   variable A, where h is more significant than g.  Similar variables
   are labeled by A0,A1,..., with the notation A(0),A(1),... being used
   to denote those same variables if this improves readability.  

   Given a 64-bit word, the function MSW extracts the most significant 
   32 bits, while the function LSW extracts the least significant 32 
   bits. 

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 2]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

   Constants prefixed with 0x are in hexadecimal notation.  In 
   particular, the constant WORDSIZE is defined to be 0x100000000. 

2.2  Inner State

   The internal state of the stream cipher consists of 513 bits.  512 
   bits are divided between eight 32-bit state variables X0,...,X7 and 
   eight 32-bit counter variables C0,...,C7.  In addition, there is one 
   counter carry bit b. 

2.3  Key Setup Scheme

   The counter carry bit b is initialized to zero.  The state and 
   counter words are derived from the key K[127..0]. 

   The key is divided into subkeys K0 = K[15..0], K1 = K[31..16], ... 
   K7 = K[127..112].  The initial state is initialized as follows:

     for j=0 to 7:
       if j is even:
         Xj = K(j+1 mod 8) || Kj
         Cj = K(j+4 mod 8) || K(j+5 mod 8)
       else:
         Xj = K(j+5 mod 8) || K(j+4 mod 8)
         Cj = Kj || K(j+1 mod 8)

   The system is then iterated four times, each iteration consisting
   of counter update (section 2.5) and next-state function (section 
   2.6).  After that, the counter variables are reinitialized to:

     for j=0 to 7:
       Cj = Cj ^ X(j+4 mod 8)

2.4  IV Setup Scheme

   If an IV is used for encryption, the counter variables are modified
   after the key setup.  Denoting the IV bits by IV[63..0], the setup
   proceeds as follows:

     C0 = C0 ^ IV[31..0]        C1 = C1 ^ (IV[63..48] || IV[31..16])
     C2 = C2 ^ IV[63..32]       C3 = C3 ^ (IV[47..32] || IV[15..0])
     C4 = C4 ^ IV[31..0]        C5 = C5 ^ (IV[63..48] || IV[31..16])
     C6 = C6 ^ IV[63..32]       C7 = C7 ^ (IV[47..32] || IV[15..0])

   The system is then iterated another 4 times, each iteration 
   consisting of counter update (section 2.5) and next-state function 
   (section 2.6). 

   The relationship between key and IV setup is as follows: 
   - After the key setup, the resulting inner state is saved as a master
     state.  Then the IV setup is run to obtain the first encryption 

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 3]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

     starting state. 
   - Whenever re-initialization under a new IV is necessary, the IV 
     setup is run on the master state again to derive the next 
     encryption starting state.

2.5  Counter System

   Before each execution of the next-state function (section 2.6), the
   counter system has to be updated.  This system uses constants 
   A1,...,A7, as follows:

     A0 = 0x4D34D34D         A1 = 0xD34D34D3
     A2 = 0x34D34D34         A3 = 0x4D34D34D
     A4 = 0xD34D34D3         A5 = 0x34D34D34
     A6 = 0x4D34D34D         A7 = 0xD34D34D3

   It also uses the counter carry bit b to update the counter system, as 
   follows:

     for j=0 to 7:
       temp = Cj + Aj + b
       b    = temp div WORDSIZE
       Cj   = temp mod WORDSIZE 

   Note that on exiting this loop, the variable b has to be preserved 
   for the next iteration of the system. 

2.6  Next-State Function

   The core of the Rabbit algorithm is the next-state function.  It is 
   based on the function g, which transforms two 32-bit inputs into one
   32-bit output, as follows:

     g(u,v) = LSW(square(u+v)) ^ MSW(square(u+v))

   where square(u+v) = ((u+v mod WORDSIZE) * (u+v mod WORDSIZE)). 

   Using this function, the algorithm updates the inner state as 
   follows:

     for j=0 to 7:
       Gj = g(Xj,Cj)

     X0 = G0 + (G7 <<< 16) + (G6 <<< 16) mod WORDSIZE
     X1 = G1 + (G0 <<<  8) +  G7         mod WORDSIZE
     X2 = G2 + (G1 <<< 16) + (G0 <<< 16) mod WORDSIZE
     X3 = G3 + (G2 <<<  8) +  G1         mod WORDSIZE
     X4 = G4 + (G3 <<< 16) + (G2 <<< 16) mod WORDSIZE
     X5 = G5 + (G4 <<<  8) +  G3         mod WORDSIZE
     X6 = G6 + (G5 <<< 16) + (G4 <<< 16) mod WORDSIZE
     X7 = G7 + (G6 <<<  8) +  G5         mod WORDSIZE

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 4]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

2.7  Extraction Scheme

   After the key and IV setup are concluded, the algorithm is iterated 
   in order to produce one 128-bit output block S per round.  Each round 
   consists of executing steps 2.5 and 2.6 and then extracting an output 
   S[127..0] as follows:

     S[15..0]    = X0[15..0]  ^ X5[31..16]    
     S[31..16]   = X0[31..16] ^ X3[15..0]
     S[47..32]   = X2[15..0]  ^ X7[31..16]
     S[63..48]   = X2[31..16] ^ X5[15..0]
     S[79..64]   = X4[15..0]  ^ X1[31..16]
     S[95..80]   = X4[31..16] ^ X7[15..0]
     S[111..96]  = X6[15..0]  ^ X3[31..16]
     S[127..112] = X6[31..16] ^ X1[15..0]

2.8  Encryption / Decryption Scheme

   Given a 128-bit message block M, encryption E and decryption M' are 
   computed via

     E  = M ^ S    and
     M' = E ^ S. 

   If S is the same in both operations (as it should if the same key and 
   IV are used), then M = M'. 

   The encryption/decryption scheme is repeated until all blocks in the 
   message have been encrypted/decrypted.  If the message size is not a 
   multiple of 128 bit, only the needed amount of least significant bits 
   from the last output block S is used for the last message block M. 

   In case the application requires the encryption of smaller blocks (or
   even individual bits), a 128-bit buffer is used.  The buffer is 
   initialized by generating a new value S and copying it into the 
   buffer.  After that, all data blocks are encrypted using the least 
   significant bits in this buffer.  Whenever the buffer is empty, a new 
   value S is generated and copied into the buffer.  

3.  Security Considerations

   For an encryption algorithm, the security provided is of course the
   most important issue.  No security weaknesses have been found to 
   date, neither by the designers nor by independent cryptographers 
   scrutinizing the algorithms after its publication in [1]. Note that a 
   full discussion of Rabbit's security against known cryptanalytic 
   techniques is provided in [3]. 

   In the following, we restrict ourselves to some rules on how to use
   the Rabbit algorithm properly. 

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 5]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

3.1   Message length

   Rabbit was designed to encrypt up to 2 to the power of 64 128-bit
   message blocks under the same the key.  Should this amount of data 
   ever be exceeded, the key has to be replaced.  It is recommended to 
   follow this rule even when the IV is changed on a regular basis.

3.2   Initialization vector

   It is possible to run Rabbit without the IV setup.  However, in this 
   case, the generator must never be reset under the same key, since 
   this would destroy its security (for a recent example, see [4]). 
   However, in order to guarantee synchronization between sender and
   receiver, ciphers are frequently reset in practice.  This means that
   both sender and receiver set the inner state of the cipher back to a 
   known value and then derive the new encryption state using an IV.  If 
   this is done, it is important to make sure that no IV is ever reused 
   under the same key. 

4.   IANA Consideration

No IANA considerations. 

Appendix A.   Test Vectors

   This is a set of test vectors for conformance testing, given in 
   octet form.  For use with Rabbit, they have to be transformed into
   integers by the conversion primitives OS2IP and I2OSP, as described 
   in [5].

A.1  Testing without IV setup

     key  = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00]
     S[0] = [B1 57 54 F0 36 A5 D6 EC F5 6B 45 26 1C 4A F7 02]
     S[1] = [88 E8 D8 15 C5 9C 0C 39 7B 69 6C 47 89 C6 8A A7]
     S[2] = [F4 16 A1 C3 70 0C D4 51 DA 68 D1 88 16 73 D6 96]

     key  = [91 28 13 29 2E 3D 36 FE 3B FC 62 F1 DC 51 C3 AC]
     S[0] = [3D 2D F3 C8 3E F6 27 A1 E9 7F C3 84 87 E2 51 9C]
     S[1] = [F5 76 CD 61 F4 40 5B 88 96 BF 53 AA 85 54 FC 19]
     S[2] = [E5 54 74 73 FB DB 43 50 8A E5 3B 20 20 4D 4C 5E]

     key  = [83 95 74 15 87 E0 C7 33 E9 E9 AB 01 C0 9B 00 43]
     S[0] = [0C B1 0D CD A0 41 CD AC 32 EB 5C FD 02 D0 60 9B]
     S[1] = [95 FC 9F CA 0F 17 01 5A 7B 70 92 11 4C FF 3E AD]
     S[2] = [96 49 E5 DE 8B FC 7F 3F 92 41 47 AD 3A 94 74 28]

A.2  Testing with IV setup

     mkey = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00]

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 6]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

     iv   = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00]
     S[0] = [C6 A7 27 5E F8 54 95 D8 7C CD 5D 37 67 05 B7 ED]
     S[1] = [5F 29 A6 AC 04 F5 EF D4 7B 8F 29 32 70 DC 4A 8D]
     S[2] = [2A DE 82 2B 29 DE 6C 1E E5 2B DB 8A 47 BF 8F 66]

     iv   = [C3 73 F5 75 C1 26 7E 59]
     S[0] = [1F CD 4E B9 58 00 12 E2 E0 DC CC 92 22 01 7D 6D]
     S[1] = [A7 5F 4E 10 D1 21 25 01 7B 24 99 FF ED 93 6F 2E]
     S[2] = [EB C1 12 C3 93 E7 38 39 23 56 BD D0 12 02 9B A7]

     iv   = [A6 EB 56 1A D2 F4 17 27]
     S[0] = [44 5A D8 C8 05 85 8D BF 70 B6 AF 23 A1 51 10 4D]
     S[1] = [96 C8 F2 79 47 F4 2C 5B AE AE 67 C6 AC C3 5B 03]
     S[2] = [9F CB FC 89 5F A7 1C 17 31 3D F0 34 F0 15 51 CB]

Appendix B.   Debugging Vectors

   The following set of vectors describes the inner state of Rabbit
   during key and iv setup.  It is meant mainly for debugging
   purposes. Octet strings are written according to I2OSP conventions.

B.1  Testing round function and key setup

     key  = [91 28 13 29 2E ED 36 FE 3B FC 62 F1 DC 51 C3 AC]

     Inner state after key expansion:
     b  = 0
     X0 = 0xDC51C3AC, X1 = 0x13292E3D, X2 = 0x3BFC62F1, X3 = 0xC3AC9128, 
     X4 = 0x2E3D36FE, X5 = 0x62F1DC51, X6 = 0x91281329, X7 = 0x36FE3BFC, 
     C0 = 0x36FE2E3D, C1 = 0xDC5162F1, C2 = 0x13299128, C3 = 0x3BFC36FE, 
     C4 = 0xC3ACDC51, C5 = 0x2E3D1329, C6 = 0x62F13BFC, C7 = 0x9128C3AC

     Inner state after first key setup iteration:
     b  = 1
     X0 = 0xF2E8C8B1, X1 = 0x38E06FA7, X2 = 0x9A0D72C0, X3 = 0xF21F5334, 
     X4 = 0xCACDCCC3, X5 = 0x4B239CBE, X6 = 0x0565DCCC, X7 = 0xB1587C8D, 
     C0 = 0x8433018A, C1 = 0xAF9E97C4, C2 = 0x47FCDE5D, C3 = 0x89310A4B, 
     C4 = 0x96FA1124, C5 = 0x6310605E, C6 = 0xB0260F49, C7 = 0x6475F87F

     Inner state after fourth key setup iteration:
     b  = 0
     X0 = 0x1D059312, X1 = 0xBDDC3E45, X2 = 0xF440927D, X3 = 0x50CBB553, 
     X4 = 0x36709423, X5 = 0x0B6F0711, X6 = 0x3ADA3A7B, X7 = 0xEB9800C8, 
     C0 = 0x6BD17B74, C1 = 0x2986363E, C2 = 0xE676C5FC, C3 = 0x70CF8432, 
     C4 = 0x10E1AF9E, C5 = 0x018A47FD, C6 = 0x97C48931, C7 = 0xDE5D96F9

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 7]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

     Inner state after final key setup xor:
     b  = 0
     X0 = 0x1D059312, X1 = 0xBDDC3E45, X2 = 0xF440927D, X3 = 0x50CBB553, 
     X4 = 0x36709423, X5 = 0x0B6F0711, X6 = 0x3ADA3A7B, X7 = 0xEB9800C8, 
     C0 = 0x5DA1EF57, C1 = 0x22E9312F, C2 = 0xDCACFF87, C3 = 0x9B5784FA, 
     C4 = 0x0DE43C8C, C5 = 0xBC5679B8, C6 = 0x63841B4C, C7 = 0x8E9623AA

     Inner state after generation of 48 bytes of output:
     b  = 1
     X0 = 0xB5428566, X1 = 0xA2593617, X2 = 0xFF5578DE, X3 = 0x7293950F, 
     X4 = 0x145CE109, X5 = 0xC93875B0, X6 = 0xD34306E0, X7 = 0x43FEEF87, 
     C0 = 0x45406940, C1 = 0x9CD0CFA9, C2 = 0x7B26E725, C3 = 0x82F5FEE2, 
     C4 = 0x87CBDB06, C5 = 0x5AD06156, C6 = 0x4B229534, C7 = 0x087DC224

     The 48 output bytes:
     S[0] = [3D 2D F3 C8 3E F6 27 A1 E9 7F C3 84 87 E2 51 9C]
     S[1] = [F5 76 CD 61 F4 40 5B 88 96 BF 53 AA 85 54 FC 19]
     S[2] = [E5 54 74 73 FB DB 43 50 8A E5 3B 20 20 4D 4C 5E]

B.2  Testing the IV setup

     key  = [91 28 13 29 2E ED 36 FE 3B FC 62 F1 DC 51 C3 AC]
     iv   = [C3 73 F5 75 C1 26 7E 59]

     Inner state during key setup:
     as above

     Inner state after IV expansion:
     b  = 0
     X0 = 0x1D059312, X1 = 0xBDDC3E45, X2 = 0xF440927D, X3 = 0x50CBB553, 
     X4 = 0x36709423, X5 = 0x0B6F0711, X6 = 0x3ADA3A7B, X7 = 0xEB9800C8, 
     C0 = 0x9C87910E, C1 = 0xE19AF009, C2 = 0x1FDF0AF2, C3 = 0x6E22FAA3, 
     C4 = 0xCCC242D5, C5 = 0x7F25B89E, C6 = 0xA0F7EE39, C7 = 0x7BE35DF3

     Inner state after first IV setup iteration:
     b  = 1
     X0 = 0xC4FF831A, X1 = 0xEF5CD094, X2 = 0xC5933855, X3 = 0xC05A5C03, 
     X4 = 0x4A50522F, X5 = 0xDF487BE4, X6 = 0xA45FA013, X7 = 0x05531179, 
     C0 = 0xE9BC645B, C1 = 0xB4E824DC, C2 = 0x54B25827, C3 = 0xBB57CDF0, 
     C4 = 0xA00F77A8, C5 = 0xB3F905D3, C6 = 0xEE2CC186, C7 = 0x4F3092C6

     Inner state after fourth IV setup iteration:
     b  = 1
     X0 = 0x6274E424, X1 = 0xE14CE120, X2 = 0xDA8739D9, X3 = 0x65E0402D, 
     X4 = 0xD1281D10, X5 = 0xBD435BAA, X6 = 0x4E9E7A02, X7 = 0x9B467ABD, 
     C0 = 0xD15ADE44, C1 = 0x2ECFC356, C2 = 0xF32C3FC6, C3 = 0xA2F647D7, 
     C4 = 0x19F71622, C5 = 0x5272ED72, C6 = 0xD5CB3B6E, C7 = 0xC9183140

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 8]

INTERNET DRAFT              Rabbit Encryption              November 2005 

References

   [1]   M. Boesgaard, M. Vesterager, T. Pedersen, J. Christiansen, 
         O. Scavenius. "Rabbit: A New High-Performance Stream Cipher".
         Proc. Fast Software Encryption 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer
         Science 2887, p. 307-329. Springer, 2003.

   [2]   ECRYPT eSTREAM project, available from
         http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/stream/

   [3]   M. Boesgaard, T. Pedersen, M. Vesterager, E. Zenner. "The 
         Rabbit Stream Cipher - Design and Security Analysis". Proc. 
         SASC Workshop 2004, available from http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/
         research/projects/ecrypt/stvl/sasc.html. 

   [4]   H. Wu. "The Misuse of RC4 in Microsoft Word and Excel". 
         IACR eprint archive 2005/007, available from
         http://eprint.iacr.org/2005/007.pdf.

   [5]   B. Kaliski, J. Staddon. "PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography 
         Specifications, Version 2.0". RFC 2437. 1998. 

Authors' Address

   Martin Boesgaard, Mette Vesterager, Erik Zenner
   Cryptico A/S
   Fruebjergvej 3
   2100 Copenhagen
   Denmark

   phone: +45 39 17 96 06
   email: {mab,mvp,ez}@cryptico.com
   URL:   http://wwww.cryptico.com

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).  This document is subject 
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an  
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS 
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET 
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, 
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE 
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED 
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

This document expires May 22, 2006                  

Boesgaard et al.              Informational                     [page 9]