datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Comparison of DECADE with CDNi
draft-zhang-decade-cdni-comparison-00

Document type: Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Document stream: No stream defined
Last updated: 2012-09-06 (latest revision 2012-03-05)
Intended RFC status: Unknown
Other versions: (expired, archived): plain text, pdf, html

Stream State:No stream defined
Document shepherd: No shepherd assigned

IESG State: Expired
Responsible AD: (None)
Send notices to: No addresses provided

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. Unofficial copies of old Internet-Drafts can be found here:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-decade-cdni-comparison

Abstract

This document gives a brief comparison of DECADE and CDNi, two working groups on content delivery. CDNi aims at overcoming the limited resource and footprints of a single CDN by interconnecting multiple CDNs. While DECADE is mainly concerned with reducing the last-mile bandwidth bottleneck and inter-domain traffics with in- network storage. This in-network storage can also be utilized by Content Service Providers (CSPs) as a CDN, whose footprints be across multiple Internet Service Providers (CSPs). In this sense, DECADE can also be a possible approach to overcome the limited footprints of a single CDN. This document attempts to gain some understanding on the relationship of these two solutions.

Authors

Peng Zhang <pzhang.thu@gmail.com>

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid)