%% You should probably cite draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang instead of this I-D.
@techreport{zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg-07,
    number =    {draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg/07/},
    author =    {Lianshu Zheng and Sam Aldrin and Guangying Zheng and Greg Mirsky and Reshad Rahman and faiqbal@cisco.com},
    title =     {{YANG Data Model for LSP-Ping}},
    pagetotal = 27,
    year =      2018,
    month =     mar,
    day =       1,
    abstract =  {When an LSP fails to deliver user traffic, the failure cannot always be detected by the MPLS control plane. RFC 8029 defines a mechanism that would enable users to detect such failure and to isolate faults. YANG, defined in RFC 6020, is a data model definition language that was introduced to define the contents of a conceptual data stores that allow networked devices to be managed using NETCONF, as specified in RFC 6241. This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage LSP-Ping.},
}